Re: [Mjpeg-users] spam on the list (was boasts)

On 7 Aug 2003, Ronald Bultje wrote: You're right, unfortunately. The list is open-to-all for postings. I can move it to restricted-to-members, which means you have to sign up to the list before sending messages. In the past, we didn't do this so people could send their questions even without

Re: [Mjpeg-users] spam on the list (was boasts)

Am Donnerstag, 7. August 2003 19:16 schrieb Ronald Bultje: I basically agree with you and therefore propose to move it to restricted mode. Anyone against? No! Also I like it how transcode handles the archive: If you go to

[Mjpeg-users] spam on the list (was boasts)

So what's up with all the pathetic spam that seems to have started coming through on the mjpeg lists more often these days? If you'd like to move the lists somewhere with better spam filtering, if sourceforge can't hack it, I'd be happy to host them for you. I know my leaving the list wouldn't

Re: [Mjpeg-users] spam on the list (was boasts)

this list want to support advertisers. Although, signing up will arise privacy issues, what kind of information do you have to provide when signing up? --Vlad E-mail address, and whether or not you prefer to read the list in digest mode. /Sam

RE: [Mjpeg-users] spam on the list (was boasts)

Title: RE: [Mjpeg-users] spam on the list (was boasts) You're right, unfortunately. The list is open-to-all for postings. I can move it to restricted-to-members, which means you have to sign up to the list before sending messages. In the past, we didn't do this so people could send