I tried also adding tag is_in: no way.
What happen is that I search for an address, I insert the name, it founds the
address name I look for and shows me a short list of names starting with the
chars I input, as soon as I select the address I look for, it says "no match
found".
:-(
I don't k
Hi Marco,
> Mark, do you have some advice about OSM tagging for address search?
If a road has a name or reference it will have an entry in the address
search data structure. It needs also to have a city associated with it
which can either be the nearest city (town, village, etc.) or the
road can
Yeah getting that 3byte field to work would be splendid. There are so
many lines that one can't differentiate without it. Especially as
Maspource only displays half as many compared to the gps.
Mark Burton wrote:
Felix,
O.k. so there must be another reason.
Maybe its as well related to r
Felix,
> O.k. so there must be another reason.
>
> Maybe its as well related to road_speed or road_class?
> (Garmin may think that the lower the road_speed the higher the chance
> that there are buildings that obstruct GPS reception, or the lower the
> accuracy of the maps, cause minor roads a
O.k. so there must be another reason.
Maybe its as well related to road_speed or road_class?
(Garmin may think that the lower the road_speed the higher the chance
that there are buildings that obstruct GPS reception, or the lower the
accuracy of the maps, cause minor roads are not that well map
Hi Felix,
BTW - thanks to those who have responded re performance of the current
value.
> Strange that it's working for you. I'm allways on SVN latest wit hVista
> HCx, I even think that before the updates it worked better. Anyhow I now
> use the different value and am happy. Could it be that
Strange that it's working for you. I'm allways on SVN latest wit hVista
HCx, I even think that before the updates it worked better. Anyhow I now
use the different value and am happy. Could it be that it's only not
working when going slow, maybe it works at carspeeds?
Ralf Kleineisel wrote:
Ma
Mark Burton wrote:
With my vista hcx and using the current value of 0x110301, the route
recalculates if I go off course by no more than about 25m. I believe
other people are also getting similar results. Perhaps people could
confirm that?
My eTrex Legend HCx with a map generated by mkgmap r102
Nuvi 255 here. Route recalculation works very well now (25/30m). I remember a
month ago (+/-) it was much worse (say > 100m).
Mark, do you have some advice about OSM tagging for address search?
Ciao.
--- Sab 13/6/09, Mark Burton ha scritto:
> Da: Mark Burton
> Oggetto: Re: [mkgmap-dev] rout
Mark Burton wrote:
> Hi Felix,
>
>> Let's hear them. I got many many complaints that my maps don't
>> recalculate...
>
> Speak up chaps, how's the recalculating working out?
With the current mkgmap I get recalculation between 25 and 50m. Prior to
the discussion "[mkgmap-dev] [PATCH] route rec
Hi Felix,
> Let's hear them. I got many many complaints that my maps don't
> recalculate...
Speak up chaps, how's the recalculating working out?
> How can I change 0x110301 so that it sets 1,4,23 instead of 1,3,17?
Change line 170 of src/uk/me/parabola/imgfmt/app/trergn/TREHeader.java
to outp
Let's hear them. I got many many complaints that my maps don't
recalculate...
How can I change 0x110301 so that it sets 1,4,23 instead of 1,3,17?
Mark Burton wrote:
Hi Felix,
I found out the problem associated to route recalculation not working
(well working but only far too late). We curr
Hi Felix,
> I found out the problem associated to route recalculation not working
> (well working but only far too late). We currently set the TRE header at
> 1,3,17 IF we change this over to 1,4,23 route recalculation kicks in at
> around 25-30m instead of 300-400 (as it happens with 1,3,17 w
I found out the problem associated to route recalculation not working
(well working but only far too late). We currently set the TRE header at
1,3,17 IF we change this over to 1,4,23 route recalculation kicks in at
around 25-30m instead of 300-400 (as it happens with 1,3,17 we currently
use) on
--- Sab 13/6/09, Mark Burton ha scritto:
> Da: Mark Burton
> Oggetto: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Search for address
> A: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> Data: Sabato 13 giugno 2009, 11:00
>
> Hi Marco,
>
> > How can I make a map that is serchable for addresses?
> Is there a specific tagging in OSM to
Version 1065 was commited by steve on 2009-06-13 12:54:03 +0100 (Sat, 13 Jun
2009)
Deal with the case where full pathnames are given on the command line.
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listin
Hi Marco,
> How can I make a map that is serchable for addresses? Is there a specific
> tagging in OSM to make search working (the search for address in Italy in my
> nuvi 255 always find "no address match").
By default, maps are generated with as much address info as we know
how to encode.
I
Sorry if I ask something already discussed.
How can I make a map that is serchable for addresses? Is there a specific
tagging in OSM to make search working (the search for address in Italy in my
nuvi 255 always find "no address match").
And what about street numbers: is it supported in any way
18 matches
Mail list logo
