Re: [WikimediaMobile] [reading-wmf] Browse Hypothesis Results

Thanks a lot for the detailed report Jon. I've parsed it and posted it to https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Reading/Web/Projects/Categories_Browse so that can keep it more accessible than the mailing list archive . Any help wit

Re: [WikimediaMobile] [reading-wmf] Browse Hypothesis Results

Thanks, Joaquin! On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 4:32 AM, Joaquin Oltra Hernandez < jhernan...@wikimedia.org> wrote: > Thanks a lot for the detailed report Jon. > > I've parsed it and posted it to > https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Reading/Web/Projects/Categories_Browse so > that can keep it more accessibl

Re: [WikimediaMobile] [reading-wmf] Browse Hypothesis Results

Great experiment! A couple questions/comments: 1. The % clickthrough per category shows SF Landmarks at 120%. Is that correct, and if so, what does it mean? 2. As a big believer in the power of categories as a driver for engagement, I would love to see more variations of this experime

Re: [WikimediaMobile] [reading-wmf] Browse Hypothesis Results

Jon thanks so much for writing this up and thanks Joaquin for putting it on the wiki (you beat me to it :)) I'm a little confused to the meaning of "tag impression" - does it mean they rendered or that the user saw them? If the latter... https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Reading/Web/Projects/Catego

Re: [WikimediaMobile] [reading-wmf] Browse Hypothesis Results

Thanks for thinking through! Responses inline On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Brian Gerstle wrote: > Great experiment! A couple questions/comments: > >1. The % clickthrough per category shows SF Landmarks at 120%. Is that >correct, and if so, what does it mean? > > It means that for eve

Re: [WikimediaMobile] [reading-wmf] Browse Hypothesis Results

Thanks for thinking through this, Jon. I think I made something unclear--responses inline. In green to make reading easier: On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Jon Robson wrote: > Jon thanks so much for writing this up and thanks Joaquin for putting it > on the wiki (you beat me to it :)) > > I'm