Hi,
In the mod_perl Guide's chapter "mod_perl for ISPs" that you can read at
http://perl.apache.org/guide/multiuser.html I go through various scenarios
that can be deployed by ISPs who want to provide mod_perl services. The
chapter talks about things to watch after, security issues and similar
Perhaps
3. multi-level hash, i.e.
$conf-{directory}-{'/'}-{sethandler}
This is, afaik, more in-line with what the Perl.../Perl sections do. I
would suggest making it so the output of this module could easily be fed into
the mod_perl configuration engine in the
Well, as most of us know mod_perl doesn't really lend itself well to the
"hosted" world because of the way it operates. However there is I think a
conceivable solution. This might sound a little crazy (or a lot), but I've
been messing around with vmware, and it's really cool/stable. One
Shane Nay [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, as most of us know mod_perl doesn't really lend itself well to the
"hosted" world because of the way it operates
Hmmm...what about a variant of the proxied mod_perl?
Picture a lite bulk front-end apache doing the usual stuff then
proxying the
Hmmm...what about a variant of the proxied mod_perl?
Picture a lite bulk front-end apache doing the usual stuff then
proxying the mod_perl stuff back to a serverly (chargeably?)
process-limited apache with a different httpd.conf per site?
Nah, not good, you still have to budget a fair
Shane Nay [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hmmm...what about a variant of the proxied mod_perl?
Picture a lite bulk front-end apache doing the usual stuff then
proxying the mod_perl stuff back to a serverly (chargeably?)
process-limited apache with a different httpd.conf per site?
Nah,
David Hodgkinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said something to this effect:
Hmmm...what about a variant of the proxied mod_perl?
Picture a lite bulk front-end apache doing the usual stuff then
proxying the mod_perl stuff back to a serverly (chargeably?)
process-limited apache with a different
Hi all...
I posted to the list a little while ago a simple regular expression
PerlHandler implementation. I've cleaned it up since then and thought I
might post it to CPAN if there is any interest. I was thinking of
Apache::Regex as the release name. I know it's a basic module, and
Hi,
We have created a new list, [EMAIL PROTECTED], to discuss development
issues. We have usually had that distributed in some way between private
mail, the -cvs list and the modperl list which is way overloaded.
subscribe by sending mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've subscribed the list of
Nathan Wiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
UseCanonicalName On# = 1
UseCanonicalName Off # = 0
#UseCanonicalName On# = undef (commented out)
That way, the logic in your script/module/whatever can set a default
value:
if ( ! defined($conf-{usecanonicalname}) ) {
# not
as long as you have mod_so compiled into apache, you should be able to add
mod_perl as a DSO. you can check with httpd -l
the advice you will get the most from this list is to recompile apache with
a static mod_perl and forget DSO, but DSO stability is reported to have
improved of late so it
I have to get mod_perl into a currently runnning apache server. How does
one go about adding mod_perl if not done at compile time?
Sysinfo:
FreeBSD 4.0-stable
Apache 1.3.6 - source install not ports collection.
=
Keith W.
At the helm for better or worse
i to need an upload solution
to get Apache::Request::upload in i just
cpan'd it down as
install Bundle::Apache
there was quite a few dependencies
that it needed
i then restarted apache
and perl-status had it in there
now my question is does anyone have a example script using this upload
the documentation in Apache::Request is pretty complete. I've only tested
Apache::Upload and don't use it in production (because I don't need to
support uploads) but you can start your script like this:
use strict;
my $r = Apache::Request-new(shift);
my $upload = $r-upload;
now you have an
On Wed, 28 Jun 2000, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote:
We have created a new list, [EMAIL PROTECTED], to discuss development
issues. We have usually had that distributed in some way between private
mail, the -cvs list and the modperl list which is way overloaded.
Is this just for development of
Perrin Harkins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said something to this effect:
On Wed, 28 Jun 2000, Jim Peters wrote:
Embperl does it all for you in that it recognises all the various form
input tags, and puts default values in for you if they are missing, by
whichever means necessary (value=,
The modperl archives are pretty clear that
panic: POPSTACK errors
caused by dies called in a eval is a perl bug.
The archives are also clear that this is often a result
of an interaction with Apache::Session, which I *was*
getting, but have since fixed(?)
My new problem is that I am getting
Geoffrey Young wrote:
the documentation in Apache::Request is pretty complete. I've only tested
Apache::Upload and don't use it in production (because I don't need to
support uploads) but you can start your script like this:
use strict;
my $r = Apache::Request-new(shift);
my $upload =
Geoffrey Young wrote:
I think lots of people are hoping libapreq gets integrated into the
mod_perl-2.0 distribution :)
--Geoff
excellent idea - What does everyone else think (Doug ?)
Greg Cope
snippage
Has anybody started/interested in an imnplementation using DBD::RAM?
On Wed, 28 Jun 2000, Drabb, James wrote:
Is there anywhere I can go for info on getting started with mod_perl on
win32 platform?
I want to switch to Apache and Perl, but most info is on setting up on a
*nix box.
At http://perl.apache.org/distributions.html, there's links
to Win32 mod_perl
Hi,
I am relocating content from a non-mod_perl Apache site to a new
mod_perl/1.24 enabled Apache server and I have a problems getting one of the
CGI scripts to behave in mod_perl. All it does is capture e-mail addresses,
and place them in a text file so we can gather them up later and drop them
If you know about people, who work for an ISP who does that, but are
not subscribed to this list, please forward this request to them.
Your input is very important... and hey there is nothing better than
a free advertisemnt and a few more new clients :)
I run a small hosting service for
Hi.
I would like to use a CHECK { } block under mod_perl, but have so far not had
any luck. It seems like mod_perl does not know how to deal with CHECK { }
blocks. Is this true? If so, can it be remedied? I cant use a BEGIN block
for what I am doing because it must happen after compilation
On Wed, 28 Jun 2000, Autarch wrote:
We have created a new list, [EMAIL PROTECTED], to discuss development
issues. We have usually had that distributed in some way between private
mail, the -cvs list and the modperl list which is way overloaded.
Is this just for development of mod_perl
No wonder Nathan Wiger on Jun 27 said that,
NW] Hi all-
NW]
NW] I've written a module that can parse the Apache httpd.conf config file
NW] (and in fact any Apache-like config file). It will take a set of
NW] directive like:
NW]
NW] ServerName www.mydomain.com
NW]
26 matches
Mail list logo
