Re: [certification]

2000-12-07 Thread Rob Tanner
--On Thursday, December 07, 2000 05:55:41 PM -0600 Jimi Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: See - I KNEW IT!!! You aren't a PHB. You have to look at this like a PHB. PHB's don't care if the paper means anything relevant. PHB's live for Plausible Deniability and Glory Hogging. If they

Re: [certification]

2000-12-07 Thread Gunther Birznieks
At 06:30 PM 12/7/2000 -0800, Rob Tanner wrote: --On Thursday, December 07, 2000 05:55:41 PM -0600 Jimi Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: See - I KNEW IT!!! You aren't a PHB. You have to look at this like a PHB. PHB's don't care if the paper means anything relevant. PHB's live for

Re: shared mem [was: mod_perl advocacy project resurrection]

2000-12-07 Thread Perrin Harkins
On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Tim Bunce wrote: On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 04:24:24PM -0800, Perrin Harkins wrote: On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, Paul wrote: I was pointed to IPC::Sharable, IPC::Sharelite. I'll look at those. Take a look at IPC::MM for a shared memory hash implemented in C. Also,

Response time under mod_perl

2000-12-07 Thread Edmar Edilton da Silva
Hi all, I need to know the response time of a Perl script running under mod_perl. To do this I need a function that it's returns the current time of the system in milliseconds. Please, have anyone any idea what function I can use? Thanks for any help... Edmar,

Re: Response time under mod_perl

2000-12-07 Thread Michael Fuhr
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 02:57:33AM -0200, Edmar Edilton da Silva wrote: I need to know the response time of a Perl script running under mod_perl. To do this I need a function that it's returns the current time of the system in milliseconds. Please, have anyone any idea what function I

Re: Response time under mod_perl

2000-12-07 Thread Adi Fairbank
Michael Fuhr wrote: On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 02:57:33AM -0200, Edmar Edilton da Silva wrote: I need to know the response time of a Perl script running under mod_perl. To do this I need a function that it's returns the current time of the system in milliseconds. Please, have anyone

Re: [OT] Slow Mailing List

2000-12-07 Thread Ask Bjoern Hansen
On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Jim Winstead wrote: [...] in the meantime, be patient. :) uhmn, it has been better the last days. Actually right now the turn around time is back to a few minutes it seems like. if it's slow it's just to give a hint to not make it worse by sending useless off-topic mail.

Re: [OT] Slow Mailing List

2000-12-07 Thread Gunther Birznieks
At 10:20 PM 12/7/2000 -0800, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote: On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Jim Winstead wrote: [...] in the meantime, be patient. :) uhmn, it has been better the last days. Actually right now the turn around time is back to a few minutes it seems like. if it's slow it's just to give a hint to

mod_perl training (was Re: Certification)

2000-12-07 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
"Gunther" == Gunther Birznieks [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Gunther A lecture format is great for spreading the word at the Gunther conferences, but hands-on training would be even better. Or Gunther perhaps there isn't a demand for mod_perl training in which Gunther case I guess that's a business

Re: [OT] Slow Mailing List

2000-12-07 Thread Gerald Richter
Anyway, if the list is slow here and if Apache.org is not willing to do anything to fix it (but it looks like they are in a few weeks!) then I Be sure, they are already working on that, but it isn't done in few minutes... Gerald -

<    1   2