Re: signal delivered to a different process?

2001-03-11 Thread Stas Bekman
On Sat, 10 Mar 2001, Richard Chen wrote: On Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 12:41:25PM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote: On Fri, 9 Mar 2001, Richard Chen wrote: This is pretty weird situation. I have installed a signal handler in startup.pl which showed that the signal is delivered to a different

Re: mod_perl shared memory with MM

2001-03-11 Thread Christian Jaeger
At 22:23 Uhr -0500 10.3.2001, DeWitt Clinton wrote: On Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 04:35:02PM -0800, Perrin Harkins wrote: Christian Jaeger wrote: Yes, it uses a separate file for each variable. This way also locking is solved, each variable has it's own file lock. You should take a look at

[OT] Re: mod_perl shared memory with MM

2001-03-11 Thread DeWitt Clinton
On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 03:33:12PM +0100, Christian Jaeger wrote: I've looked at Cache::FileCache now and think it's (currently) not possible to use for IPC::FsSharevars: I really miss locking capabilities. Imagine a script that reads a value at the beginning of a request and writes it

Re: [OT] JMS-like event framework for Perl

2001-03-11 Thread Paul Kulchenko
Hi, Gunther! Although SOAP::Lite interfaces with SMTP and POP3, I don't know if SOAP::Lite really qualifies to be in the same class as products like JMS, Neon, or Microsoft MSMQ. I think not or at least not yet :). However, I think the description of what the author is interested in is a bit

Re: [OT] Re: mod_perl shared memory with MM

2001-03-11 Thread Perrin Harkins
I'm very intrigued by your thinking on locking. I had never considered the transaction based approach to caching you are referring to. I'll take this up privately with you, because we've strayed far off the mod_perl topic, although I find it fascinating. One more suggestion before you take

Re: [OT] Re: mod_perl shared memory with MM

2001-03-11 Thread Greg Cope
DeWitt Clinton wrote: On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 03:33:12PM +0100, Christian Jaeger wrote: I've looked at Cache::FileCache now and think it's (currently) not possible to use for IPC::FsSharevars: I really miss locking capabilities. Imagine a script that reads a value at the beginning

Re: [OT] Re: mod_perl shared memory with MM

2001-03-11 Thread Perrin Harkins
Can I ask why you are not useing IPC::Sharedlight (as its pure C and apparently much faster than IPC::Shareable - I've never benchmarked it as I've also used IPC::Sharedlight). Full circle back to the original topic... IPC::MM is implemented in C and offers an actual hash interface backed by

Re: [OT] Re: mod_perl shared memory with MM

2001-03-11 Thread Greg Cope
Perrin Harkins wrote: Can I ask why you are not useing IPC::Sharedlight (as its pure C and apparently much faster than IPC::Shareable - I've never benchmarked it as I've also used IPC::Sharedlight). Full circle back to the original topic... IPC::MM is implemented in C and offers an