> Can I ask why you are not useing IPC::Sharedlight (as its pure C and > apparently much faster than IPC::Shareable - I've never benchmarked it > as I've also used IPC::Sharedlight). Full circle back to the original topic... IPC::MM is implemented in C and offers an actual hash interface backed by a BTree in shared memory. IPC::ShareLite only works for individual scalars. It wouldn't surprise me if a file system approach was faster than either of these on Linux, because of the agressive caching. - Perrin
- Re: mod_perl shared memory with MM Christian Jaeger
- Re: mod_perl shared memory with MM Perrin Harkins
- Re: mod_perl shared memory with MM Christian Jaeger
- Re: mod_perl shared memory with MM Perrin Harkins
- Re: mod_perl shared memory with MM DeWitt Clinton
- Re: mod_perl shared memory with MM Perrin Harkins
- Re: mod_perl shared memory with MM Christian Jaeger
- [OT] Re: mod_perl shared memory... DeWitt Clinton
- Re: [OT] Re: mod_perl shared me... Perrin Harkins
- Re: [OT] Re: mod_perl shared me... Greg Cope
- Re: [OT] Re: mod_perl shared me... Perrin Harkins
- Re: [OT] Re: mod_perl shared me... Greg Cope