Hi Rob,
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Robert Landrum wrote:
> >> Can't locate auto/CapWiz/Mail/App/handler.al in @INC
> >[snip], [snip]
This puzzles me too...
> sub handler {
Looks like your process is looking for "handler.al" not "handler".
Have you tried renaming the handler to something like handle
Hi Werner,
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, werner.schmidt-wilczek wrote:
> I am using mod_perl for our Intranet. The performance is great, but there
> are many sideeffects!
http://perl.apache.org/guide :)
> sometimes it seems mod_perl has forgotten the array.
There are many ways of sharing data between
Hello!
I am developing an module wich will provide a valid Session-ID for
each configured location/directory.
But there is a problem. If there is a sub request without valid
Session-ID (because the initial request didn't need one), but the
requested Location requires one, what should the module
Hi.
I am thinking about using Apache::Include->virtual instead of plain open,
read, close for reading in my templates. What is the overhead of doing an
internal subrequest compared to plain read? What do I get in return? I know
I get content negotiated templates - thats why I am thinking abou
I am currently using Storables lock_store and lock_retrieve to maintain
a persistent data structure. I use a session_id as a key and each data
structure has a last modified time that I use to expire it. I was under
the impression that these two functions would be safe for concurrent
access, but
Sorry,
I am running mod_perl 1.24_01, Apache 1.3.19, on Redhat 7.0 Storable
1.011
> I am currently using Storables lock_store and lock_retrieve to maintain
> a persistent data structure. I use a session_id as a key and each data
> structure has a last modified time that I use to expire it. I was under
> the impression that these two functions would be safe for concurrent
> ac
Perrin Harkins wrote:
> > I am currently using Storables lock_store and lock_retrieve to maintain
> > a persistent data structure. I use a session_id as a key and each data
> > structure has a last modified time that I use to expire it. I was under
> > the impression that these two functions
This is important when clustering for redundancy purposes,
I'm trying to address 2 issues:
A. Avoiding a single point of failure associated with a
having a central repository for the data, such as a NFS
share or a single database server.
B. Avoiding the overhead from using heavyweight to
I assume everyone saw this... ;)
http://www.oreilly.com/parrot/
Bill Moseley
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I'm trying to address 2 issues:
>
> A. Avoiding a single point of failure associated with a
>having a central repository for the data, such as a NFS
>share or a single database server.
> B. Avoiding the overhead from using heavyweight tools like
>database replication.
>
> So I've bee
11 matches
Mail list logo