Re: Apache::Registry HEAD request also return document body

Adam Prime wrote: >>>The perldoc Apache::Registry says >>>"Apache::Registry - Run unaltered CGI scrips under mod_perl" >>> >>Were your CGI scripts designed to handle HEAD requests? You >>don't have >>to alter them to run under mod_perl, do you? >> > > You didn't have to design them to because

Class data & preloading modules

Hi, I have some modules that use the idiom package Foo; use Bar; { my $bar = Bar->new(args); sub bar { return $bar } } which works fine until one tries to preload them in startup.pl. I realized that, by preloading, I was innocently sharing the same DBI object between Apache children (not

RE: Apache::Registry HEAD request also return document body

> > The perldoc Apache::Registry says > > "Apache::Registry - Run unaltered CGI scrips under mod_perl" > > Were your CGI scripts designed to handle HEAD requests? You > don't have > to alter them to run under mod_perl, do you? You didn't have to design them to because apache handles it for yo

Re: Apache::Registry HEAD request also return document body

Jean-Michel Hiver wrote: >>You can subclass Apache::RegistryNG to do what you want and send the >>patch for others to re-use. >> > > The perldoc Apache::Registry says > "Apache::Registry - Run unaltered CGI scrips under mod_perl" Were your CGI scripts designed to handle HEAD requests? You do

Re: Apache::Registry HEAD request also return document body

Hi All, > Well, you won't save CPU if you need to compute the whole page anyway... > And we're talking of dynamic generated pages, most won't be cached, and those > that will might as well send an Expires: header, in which case the proxy > and browser will cache the data unless the user forces th

Re: Apache::AuthCookie login faliure reason

Bill Moseley wrote: > > At 04:09 PM 11/23/2001 +1100, simran wrote: > > Hi All, > > I am having some trouble getting Apache::AuthCookie (version 3 which i > believe is the latest version) to do what want: > > What i want is: > > * To be able to give the user a reson if login fails > - e

Re: Apache::Registry HEAD request also return document body

On Fri 23-Nov-2001 at 11:45:19PM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote: > did you mean to reply to the list? before I reply? Sorry I screwed up because my mailer doesn't know yet that [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a mailing list. I guess it's time to go tweak my muttrc file ;-) So here is a cleaner repost: > You ca

Re: Apache::Registry HEAD request also return document body

> computing the headers, sure. But there are number of things that you > might want to be in the headers (like date last modified, md5 checksum, > content language, content length, etc) and they need the whole page to > be computed anyway. > > You could argue that sending minimalistic headers to

Re: Apache::Registry HEAD request also return document body

At 03:21 PM 11/23/01 +, Jean-Michel Hiver wrote: >Duh... That's a lot of info for a head request :-) Yes, and that's what I get for using HEAD to test! Yesterday's holliday doesn't help todays thinking. How about patching Apache::Registry? Oh, Stas, of course, just posted a better solution

Re: Apache::Registry HEAD request also return document body

> You can subclass Apache::RegistryNG to do what you want and send the > patch for others to re-use. The perldoc Apache::Registry says "Apache::Registry - Run unaltered CGI scrips under mod_perl" Thus I guess if I have to amend Apache::Registry it might be worth submitting a pach for a bugfix

Re: Apache::Registry HEAD request also return document body

Jean-Michel Hiver wrote: >>>PROBLEM HERE >>>A head request should * NOT * return the body of the document >>> >>You should check $r->header_only in your handler. >> >>http://thingy.kcilink.com/modperlguide/correct_headers/3_1_HEAD.html >> > > My only concern is that I thought that Apache::Re

Re: Apache::Registry HEAD request also return document body

> Try HEAD on this script. > > #!/usr/local/bin/perl -w > use CGI; > > my $q = CGI->new; > > print $q->header, $q->start_html, > join( "\n", map { "$_ : $ENV{$_}" } keys %ENV), > $q->end_html; I'm still getting the headers. I also have this behavior on other boxes (one on our redha

RE: [OT] Re: How to create a browser popup window

Title: RE: [OT] Re: How to create a browser popup window Hello, Thanks for all the window tips. I have fixed it with out using any javascript. just mention in your html head and give TARGET=_self to the references which should be opened within the parent window. Thanks, Domien --

Re: Apache::Registry HEAD request also return document body

At 02:53 PM 11/23/01 +, Jean-Michel Hiver wrote: > My only concern is that I thought that Apache::Registry was designed > to act as a CGI emulator, allowing not so badly written CGIs to have > mod_perl benefits without having to change them. Right, sorry I completely missed the Registry pa

Re: Apache::AuthCookie login faliure reason

At 04:09 PM 11/23/2001 +1100, simran wrote: Hi All, I am having some trouble getting Apache::AuthCookie (version 3 which i believe is the latest version) to do what want: What i want is: * To be able to give the user a reson if login fails - eg reason: * "No such username"

Re: Apache::Registry HEAD request also return document body

Hi, Thanks for your quick answer, > >PROBLEM HERE > >A head request should * NOT * return the body of the document > > You should check $r->header_only in your handler. > > http://thingy.kcilink.com/modperlguide/correct_headers/3_1_HEAD.html My only concern is that I thought that Apache::R

mod perl fails test on my Solaris 2.8 .. ?

Dear All, I've been tasked with setting up a mod_perl apache. I've complied my own perl etc ... in my own home dir, as I need to test our code against it, before passing it off to the addmins for pkg'ing and rolling out to other servers. perl + modules pass all tests. mod_perl appears to buil

Re: Apache::AuthCookie login faliure reason

>I am having some trouble getting Apache::AuthCookie (version 3 which i >believe is the latest version) to do what want: >What i want is: >* To be able to give the user a reson if login fails > - eg reason: * "No such username" >* "Your password was incorrect" >Has anyone else

RE: [OT] Re: Seeking Legal help

Sorry for continuing the OT thread. I just thought this might be useful... Gunther Birznieks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > By the way, if you are really working for a bank and cashflow is an issue > for you in 60 days you can also ask the bank what business banking services > they offer. O

Re: Apache::Registry HEAD request also return document body

At 11:43 AM 11/23/2001 +, Jean-Michel Hiver wrote: >PROBLEM HERE >A head request should * NOT * return the body of the document You should check $r->header_only in your handler. http://thingy.kcilink.com/modperlguide/correct_headers/3_1_HEAD.html Bill Moseley mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Apache::Registry HEAD request also return document body

Hi all, I have a problem with HTTP head requests and mod_perl. I have been looking at the docs, searching google newsgroup archive but I couldn't find anything thus you are my very last hope ;-) In order to show what the problem is, I have set up two simple identical 'Hello World' type CGI scrip

RE: Documentation patch for mod_perl//win32

Hi there, On Fri, 23 Nov 2001, Alessandro Forghieri wrote: > I sure can co-maintain such a document. The "co" part is a good idea for > several reasons - the most cogent being that I am not a native speaker Heck, you write English better than many Englishmen I know... 73, Ged.

[Fwd: Re: Documentation patch for mod_perl//win32]

Alessandro Forghieri wrote: > Greetings. > > Stas> so if Alessandro or Randy volunteers (please say so), please > Stas> ask winXX > Stas> users to send you more winXX specific notes/scenarios and you (the > Stas> volunteer) will be the official maintainer of the doc and send me the > Stas

RE: Documentation patch for mod_perl//win32

Greetings. Stas> so if Alessandro or Randy volunteers (please say so), please Stas> ask winXX Stas> users to send you more winXX specific notes/scenarios and you (the Stas> volunteer) will be the official maintainer of the doc and send me the Stas> new doc and then the future patches. For 2.0 you