Re: Apache::compat was Apache::DBI with mod_perl 2.0

Ok, I went and installed Apache from CVS this time, but it looks like that installed 2.0.40-dev and I'm still getting errors during make test of mod_perl 2. Does it have to be 2.0.39 specifically to compile? Sorry if I'm just not getting it... -Zac using Apache/2.0.40-dev (prefork MPM) [Thu

mod_perl 1.99 on Win2k with Apache2

Would someone please tell me where I can find instructions for installing the above? Thanks Nigel ITM Business Solutions Unit 4 Nine Trees Trading Estate Morthen Road Rotherham S66 9JG Reception Tel: 01709 703288 Fax: 01709 701549 Help Desk Tel:01709 530424 Fax: 01709 702159

Re: Apache::compat was Apache::DBI with mod_perl 2.0

Zac Morris wrote: Ok, I went and installed Apache from CVS this time, but it looks like that installed 2.0.40-dev and I'm still getting errors during make test of mod_perl 2. Does it have to be 2.0.39 specifically to compile? Yes, to compile 1.99_04 Sorry if I'm just not getting it...

Re: mod_perl 1.99 on Win2k with Apache2

Nigel Peck wrote: Would someone please tell me where I can find instructions for installing the above? http://perl.apache.org/release/docs/2.0/os/win32/index.html Nigel, remember that you should reply back to the list if you have any further questions. Do *not* reply to me in private!!!

Re: Apache::compat was Apache::DBI with mod_perl 2.0

Ok, I understand. Maybe some kind of message/logic in the make to tell you that you have to have specifically x, y, z. Because I honestly DID hear you say x, y, z but my brain assumed x+, y+, z+ Just a thought. Thanks, -Zac - Original Message - From: Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Apache::compat was Apache::DBI with mod_perl 2.0

Zac Morris wrote: Ok, I understand. Maybe some kind of message/logic in the make to tell you that you have to have specifically x, y, z. Because I honestly DID hear you say x, y, z but my brain assumed x+, y+, z+ I've updated the README file, which now states what you need. All the

Re: Apache::compat was Apache::DBI with mod_perl 2.0

Zac Morris wrote: Ok, still getting the same errors during make test. One of the first lines of the perl Makefile.PL --blahblah shows: Configuring Apache/2.0.39 mod_perl/1.99_04 Perl/v5.8.0 Does this mean that the make install I did on the Perl/v5.8.0_RC2 didn't take? may be you

RE: Any known good configuration for mod_perl DSO?

In response to my question, Ged Haywood pointed me at a message from Chip Turner, reproduced here in part: When it comes to perl and mod_perl, we've been working to try to make sure it works reliably from RPMs. RH 7.3 should work well out of the box, as should 7.2, once all errata applied.

Re: Any known good configuration for mod_perl DSO?

Wilbur, Charlton wrote: Or am I looking at rolling my own RPMs or installing from source RPMs? My suspicion, confirmed by Mr Turner, is that this is tied directly to shared libraries and toolchains, and so I suspect further that the problem will go away if I build everything from scratch

PerlTransHanlder and path_info() question

Hello all, I have the following question on which I would appreciate any insight. I have written a failry simple multiplexing PerlTransHandler. Its task is to check the uri and if it matches a certain string then push an associated PerlHandler onto the stack. An example can make it clearer:

RE DBD: :RAM Woes

I see noone replied to you. I can't help you now but have a need to explore this module. Maybe we can help each other. I can't get it to make test on Winsows 2000. Are you not on Windows? I haven't used this module but got the idea to use it for somthing I'm doing that is a little

[OT] RE DBD: :RAM Woes

Gabriel Emailed the author of DBD::RAM and got nearly and instantaneous response as below. Chuck Hi, DBD::RAM has been replaced by DBD::AnyData which does everything DBD::RAM did and much more (I'm the author of both). Download and install AnyData, SQL::Statement and then DBD::AnyData in

Re: missing .al files with apache/mod_perl

Hi there, On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Perrin Harkins wrote: Furthermore, this file doesn't exist in my filesystem. How is it possible that (1) the module works without this apparently required file at the command line but (2) doesn't work with apache/mod_perl ? How is it possible? Two ways:

info

infoDo You Yahoo!? µ½ÑÅ»¢Öйú2002 FIFAÊÀ½ç±­¾Û½¹¸ÐÊÜ×ãÇòµÄ÷ÈÁ¦£¡

mode_perl and Apache 2.0

Hi All Which version of mod_perl runs on latest Apachec 2.0.39 version? When I tried building mod_perl 1.27 with Apachec 2.0.39 , it gave me an error saying it needs Apache 1.3.0. Does it mean we cannot currently run mod_perl on Apache 2.0? I need to upgrade to Apache 2.0 in order to

Re: mode_perl and Apache 2.0

mod_perl-1.99_x runs on Apache 2.x , available at http://perl.apache.org/dist/ Praveen Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/28/02 10:23AM Hi All Which version of mod_perl runs on latest Apachec 2.0.39 version? When I tried building mod_perl 1.27 with Apachec 2.0.39 , it gave me an error saying it

Re: mode_perl and Apache 2.0

Praveen Ray wrote: Hi All Which version of mod_perl runs on latest Apachec 2.0.39 version? When I tried building mod_perl 1.27 with Apachec 2.0.39 , it gave me an error saying it needs Apache 1.3.0. That's correct. Does it mean we cannot currently run mod_perl on Apache 2.0? You

Image manipulation recommendation?

Hi all, I hope this isn't too far off topic. I'm working on a mod_perl web project in which it would be *really* quite handy if I could dynamically rasterize text over existing images. What I would ideally like is a pointer to a good Perl library that will allow me to take an existing image