Hi all,
I hope this isn't too far off topic. I'm working on a mod_perl web
project in which it would be *really* quite handy if I could
dynamically rasterize text over existing images.
What I would ideally like is a pointer to a good Perl library that
will allow me to take an existing image (gi
Praveen Ray wrote:
> Hi All
> Which version of mod_perl runs on latest Apachec 2.0.39
> version? When I tried building mod_perl 1.27 with Apachec
> 2.0.39 , it gave me an error saying it needs Apache
> 1.3.0.
That's correct.
> Does it mean we cannot currently run mod_perl on Apache
> 2.0?
mod_perl-1.99_x runs on Apache 2.x , available at
http://perl.apache.org/dist/
>>> Praveen Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 06/28/02 10:23AM >>>
Hi All
Which version of mod_perl runs on latest Apachec 2.0.39
version? When I tried building mod_perl 1.27 with Apachec
2.0.39 , it gave me an error sayin
Hi All
Which version of mod_perl runs on latest Apachec 2.0.39
version? When I tried building mod_perl 1.27 with Apachec
2.0.39 , it gave me an error saying it needs Apache
1.3.0.
Does it mean we cannot currently run mod_perl on Apache
2.0?
I need to upgrade to Apache 2.0 in order to g
infoDo You Yahoo!?
µ½ÑÅ»¢Öйú2002 FIFAÊÀ½ç±¾Û½¹¸ÐÊÜ×ãÇòµÄ÷ÈÁ¦£¡
Hi there,
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> >Furthermore, this file doesn't exist in my filesystem. How is it possible
> >that (1) the module works without this apparently required file at the
> >command line but (2) doesn't work with apache/mod_perl ?
> >
>
> How is it possible? T
Gabriel
Emailed the author of DBD::RAM and got nearly and instantaneous response as below.
Chuck
Hi,
DBD::RAM has been replaced by DBD::AnyData which does everything
DBD::RAM did and much more (I'm the author of both). Download and
install AnyData, SQL::Statement and then DBD::AnyData in th
I see noone replied to you. I can't help you now but have a need to explore this
module. Maybe we can help each other. I can't get it to "make test" on Winsows 2000.
Are you not on Windows?
I haven't used this module but got the idea to use it for somthing I'm doing that is a
little weir
Hello all,
I have the following question on which I would appreciate any insight.
I have written a failry simple multiplexing PerlTransHandler. Its task
is to check the uri and if it matches a certain string then push an
associated PerlHandler onto the stack. An example can make it clearer:
L
At least part of the problem can also be solved by replacing
PerlSetVar FooTicketLoginHandler /login
with
PerlSetVar FooTicketLoginHandler https://servername.domain.com/login
so that the password the user types is always passed through a secure channel.
I'm at a loss as to how to change the Apach
Wilbur, Charlton wrote:
> Or am
> I looking at rolling my own RPMs or installing from source RPMs? My
> suspicion, confirmed by Mr Turner, is that this is tied directly to shared
> libraries and toolchains, and so I suspect further that the problem will go
> away if I build everything from scratc
In response to my question, Ged Haywood pointed me at a message from Chip
Turner, reproduced here in part:
> When it comes to perl and mod_perl, we've been working to try to make
> sure it works reliably from RPMs. RH 7.3 should work well out of the
> box, as should 7.2, once all errata applied.
Zac Morris wrote:
> Ok, still getting the same errors during "make test".
>
> One of the first lines of the "perl Makefile.PL --blahblah" shows:
>
> Configuring Apache/2.0.39 mod_perl/1.99_04 Perl/v5.8.0
>
> Does this mean that the make install I did on the Perl/v5.8.0_RC2 didn't
> "take"?
may
Ok, still getting the same errors during "make test".
One of the first lines of the "perl Makefile.PL --blahblah" shows:
Configuring Apache/2.0.39 mod_perl/1.99_04 Perl/v5.8.0
Does this mean that the make install I did on the Perl/v5.8.0_RC2 didn't
"take"?
When I "perl --version" should it sho
Zac Morris wrote:
> Ok, I understand. Maybe some kind of message/logic in the make to tell you
> that you have to have specifically x, y, z. Because I honestly DID hear you
> say x, y, z but my brain assumed x+, y+, z+
I've updated the README file, which now states what you need.
All the troub
Ok, I understand. Maybe some kind of message/logic in the make to tell you
that you have to have specifically x, y, z. Because I honestly DID hear you
say x, y, z but my brain assumed x+, y+, z+
Just a thought.
Thanks,
-Zac
- Original Message -
From: "Stas Bekman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Nigel Peck wrote:
> Would someone please tell me where I can find instructions for
> installing the above?
http://perl.apache.org/release/docs/2.0/os/win32/index.html
Nigel, remember that you should reply back to the list if you have any
further questions. Do *not* reply to me in private!!!
_
Zac Morris wrote:
> Ok, I went and installed Apache from CVS this time, but it looks like that
> installed 2.0.40-dev
>
> and I'm still getting errors during "make test" of mod_perl 2. Does it have
> to be 2.0.39 specifically to compile?
Yes, to compile 1.99_04
> Sorry if I'm just not getting
Would someone please tell me where I can find instructions for
installing the above?
Thanks
Nigel
ITM Business Solutions
Unit 4
Nine Trees Trading Estate
Morthen Road
Rotherham
S66 9JG
Reception
Tel: 01709 703288
Fax: 01709 701549
Help Desk
Tel:01709 530424
Fax: 01709 702159
CONFIDENTIALITY
Ok, I went and installed Apache from CVS this time, but it looks like that
installed 2.0.40-dev
and I'm still getting errors during "make test" of mod_perl 2. Does it have
to be 2.0.39 specifically to compile?
Sorry if I'm just not getting it...
-Zac
using Apache/2.0.40-dev (prefork MPM)
[Thu
20 matches
Mail list logo
