On 12 Jul 2002, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
Oh, and add Template Toolkit (www.tt2.org) to that list.
You mean like this:
Matt EmbPerl, TT, Mason, AxKit, ASP, etc... Perhaps live sites is a more
^^
;-)
--
!-- Matt --
:-Get a smart net/:-
Nick Tonkin wrote:
The content seems great. But whatever font you've used is rendering skinny
and pixelated and hard to read and makes me want to egt of the site
asap ... why not leave font face undetermined so the font that each has
chosen for his platform is employed?
Agreed 100%, my
Hi Stas -
We were thinking to try removing font-family completely. Does anybody
know of any problems with this approach?
I don't think the problem is the font-family but instead specifying
font-size in pixels. I'm not a stylesheet expert but we had lots of
trouble getting good cross-browser
Larry Leszczynski wrote:
Hi Stas -
We were thinking to try removing font-family completely. Does anybody
know of any problems with this approach?
I don't think the problem is the font-family but instead specifying
font-size in pixels. I'm not a stylesheet expert but we had lots of
Hi all,
On Sat, 13 Jul 2002, allan wrote:
We were thinking to try removing font-family completely. Does anybody
know of any problems with this approach?
I don't think the problem is the font-family
for the major part of the content we haven't specified a
font-size at all
Once I
Ged Haywood wrote:
Hi all,
On Sat, 13 Jul 2002, allan wrote:
We were thinking to try removing font-family completely. Does anybody
know of any problems with this approach?
I don't think the problem is the font-family
for the major part of the content we haven't specified
