-Sx- said> Building as STATIC caused Apache to be rebuilt using the now
current uselargefiles setting.
Sam Tregar said> I don't think so. Rebuilding Apache/mod_perl static with
the exact same Perl that shipped with Redhat 6.2 solved the segfaults.
:)
How is this different from what I said?
Just wanted to know. Haven't gotten any posts for awhile.
Thx.
Jann
Omar Chicas wrote:
> I don't know what else to do but my configurations are:
> the
>
>SetHandler perl-script
>PerlModule Apache::ASP
>PerlHandler Apache::ASP
>PerlSetVar Global .
>PerlSetVar StateDir /tmp/asp
>
>
>
>*CORE::GLOBAL::flock = sub { 1 };
>
>
On Tue, 23 Jul 2002, WC -Sx- Jones wrote:
> Back in RH 6.2 I would hazard that the segfault was more related to Perl
> being set to uselargefiles and Apache NOT being set. This only became
> visible when one tried to build mod_perl as a DSO. Building as STATIC caused
> Apache to be rebuilt usin
Dave Rolsky wrote:
> This release has a number of important improvements and it is highly
> recommended that anyone use Mason 1.10 or 1.11 upgrade immediately in
> order to fix a nasty memory leak in ApacheHandler. 1.12 is also quite a
> bit faster than previous 1.1x versions.
>
Some quick benc
Hi everyone.
I've revisited using Attribute::Handlers work under mod perl again, and I am
still unsuccesful.
Looking at Attribute::Handlers, it appears that Attribute::Handlers relies
on CHECK blocks to do its work. I verified this by uncommenting one of the
debugging warnings in Handlers.pm an
As Dominic Mitchell already pointed out, you're better using sudo than su.
Or just add the option "owner" (and optionally "uid=uid") to /etc/fstab.
Or just chgrp scriptegid /usr/bin/smbmnt ; chmod 04750 /usr/bin/smbmnt.
Regards,
Luciano Rocha
--
Consciousness: that annoying time between naps
I have troubles using Apache::DProf
I try to use it as described at:
http://perl.apache.org/docs/1.0/guide/performance.html#Code_Profiling_Techni
ques
But when my httpd.conf has a line:
PerlModule Apache::DProf
apache reply with error 500 (Internal Server Error) when I request a perl
script,
Hi,
ouch, bad idea, wrong list, but:
4 solutions:
1.) let your webserver run as root (NEVER, NEVER
do this!!)
2.) write a daemon that runs as root and does such
things for your normal programs. (Overkill in this
case)
3.) use sudo to allow the webserver's user to run
exactly that command
I don't know what else to do but my configurations
are:
the
SetHandler perl-script PerlModule
Apache::ASP PerlHandler Apache::ASP
PerlSetVar Global . PerlSetVar StateDir /tmp/asp
*CORE::GLOBAL::flock = sub { 1
}; PerlModule Apache::ASPI copied it and pasted
Sam Tregar> No, the last Redhat Apache/mod_perl I used was in 6.2. I didn't
file a Sam Tregar> bug about it because after looking around it appeared
that it was a well Sam Tregar> known problem. After that I started
compiling Apache/mod_perl static and Sam Tregar> left the seg-faults behind.
On Tuesday 23 July 2002 12:09 pm, regarding mod_perl with a perl built with
-Dusethreads, will it work?, Brian wrote:
Brian> I would like to install Sendmail::Milter which needs a perl built
Brian> with thread support. Last time I tried to use a perl built with
Brian> thread support (5.6.x), mo
>> # ! /usr/bin/perl -w
>> `su - root -c 'mount -t smbfs -o credentials=
>> // /'`;
Check out the automounter.
--
Steven Lembark 2930 W. Palmer
Workhorse Computing Chicago, IL 60647
+1 800 762 1582
Heiss, Christian wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I don't know if this is the right mailing list, but well...
>
> How can I mount something with my perl script?
> I've got always the error: mount: only root can do this
>
> So I changed my script something like this:
>
> #! /usr/bin/perl -w
> `su - root -c
Title: Mount something with my perl script
Hello,
I don't know if this is the right mailing list, but well...
How can I mount something with my perl script?
I've got always the error: mount: only root can do this
So I changed my script something like this:
#! /usr/bin/perl -w
`su - roo
> From: mike808 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 24 July 2002 05:54
> To: Lincoln Stein; Cope, Greg; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: possible buget in CGI.pm
>
> Lincoln, Greg, mod_perl list:
>
> The problem appears to be that the -no_xhtml option is only
> processed in
> _setup_symbols. This
After reading the comments in "Static vs. DSO on Linux specifically" I was
reminded that I had forgotton to say the following:
Red Hat are testing httpd-2.0 and mod_perl-1.99 with regard to including
them in the next release of Red Hat Linux. There is a beta release
available as described in t
17 matches
Mail list logo
