Can you guys please snip the emails down to the relevant information?
Having to scroll past lots of rubbish at the end of the email gets
annoying (and I'm not even a digest subscriber). Thanks.
Michael Robinton wrote:
> Stas wrote:
>
>>Michael Robinton wrote:
>>
>>>I have a proposed perl / modperl module that will go to CPAN
>>>
>>> Graphics::ColorPicker : A perl module for WYSIWYG web
>>> applications that allow selection of HEX color numbers
>>>
>>>I think this is an appropriate nam
Gerald:
Any comment on Paulo's question ? (I am interested in that knowledge too.)
I doubt that NTLM does not need any password. Logically, there must be a way
to set up the initial trustful connection between two machines. If not
password, what will that be ? Or something like Digital Authentic
Stas wrote:
> Michael Robinton wrote:
> > I have a proposed perl / modperl module that will go to CPAN
> >
> > Graphics::ColorPicker : A perl module for WYSIWYG web
> > applications that allow selection of HEX color numbers
> >
> > I think this is an appropriate name, but have not submitted in
> The username/password pair is sent only once to the issuer machine and the
> follow-up authentications are performed using a self-certified,
> time-limited, hash. In fact, it is based on access-control, having nothing
> to do with Basic Authentication. This is discussed in detail in the Eagle
Michael Robinton wrote:
> I have a proposed perl / modperl module that will go to CPAN
>
> Graphics::ColorPicker : A perl module for WYSIWYG web
> applications that allow selection of HEX color numbers
>
> I think this is an appropriate name, but have not submitted in
> this category before.
I have a proposed perl / modperl module that will go to CPAN
Graphics::ColorPicker : A perl module for WYSIWYG web
applications that allow selection of HEX color numbers
I think this is an appropriate name, but have not submitted in
this category before. Please advise.
See: http://www.bizsy
Stefan Sabolowitsch wrote:
> Hi NG.
> I has here the current Apache 2.040 for Win32.
> With compile of the last mod_perl2 version, get I the following error
> message.
[...]
> mod_perl.c(511) : warning C4047: 'function' : Anzahl der Dereferenzierungen bei
> 'int (__cdecl *)(struct ap_filter_t *
I have a problem with the HTTP response in the chunk
mode using mod_perl that the chunk mode trailer was
not send back to the client under the chunk mode.
When apache sends a response in the chunk mode, the
mod_perl handler invokes the ap_send_http_header()
function in the apache src/main/http_
I have a problem with the HTTP response in the chunk
mode using mod_perl.
When apache sends a response in the chunk mode, the
mod_perl handler invokes the ap_send_http_header()
function in the apache src/main/http_protocol.c file,
and the r->chunked flag is set to 1 (by the
ap_keep_alive() func
After applying that patches error message is the same.
ld -V:
ld: Software Generation Utilities - Solaris Link Editors: 5.8-1.275
btw gcc --version 2.95.2, maybe problem is with gcc ?
-i-
- Original Message -
From: "David McCabe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ihor Bilyy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The username/password pair is sent only once to the issuer machine and the
follow-up authentications are performed using a self-certified,
time-limited, hash. In fact, it is based on access-control, having nothing
to do with Basic Authentication. This is discussed in detail in the Eagle
book. I am
>
> if you check the source of the Smb implemenation of the module, you would
> see that it performs basically the same function as NTLM. I agree with you
> that it does not fit the Microsoft definition of NTLM, so it is not a NTLM
> implementation. If ones purpose is to pass the protection by pro
Randy,
My server barfed and I had to re-format. Do you think I ought to go with Apache 2? I
need to get to full time ssl to meet the security requirements anyway. I was planning
to do this when I go hit with the need to close that vulnerability in Apache. Is the
2.0 ready for prime time on
Ihor Bilyy wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> I can't build apache 1.3.26 with mod_perl 1.27 on Solaris 2.8
> I use:
> /usr/ccs/bin/ld: illegal option -- E
> usage: ld [-abc:d:e:f:h:il:mo:p:rstu:z:B:D:F:GI:L:M:N:P:Q:R:S:VY:] file(s)
Sun put out a patch to their linker (ld) that breaks the Configure script
>> You were close. It's default-handler.
>>
>> http://httpd.apache.org/docs/handler.html
>And in mod_perl docs:
>http://perl.apache.org/docs/1.0/guide/config.html#Overriding_E_lt_LocationE
_gt__Se>tting_in__Sub_Location_
__
Thanks, that was what I was looking for.
Thomas Whitney
Hello!
I can't build apache 1.3.26 with mod_perl 1.27 on Solaris 2.8
I use:
perl Makefile.pl APACHE_SRC=../apache1/src \
NO_HTTPD=1 USE_APACI=1 PREP_HTTPD \
EVERYTHING=1
and in apache directory:
./configure --activate-module=src/modules/perl/libperl.a
here is the output:
Configuring for Apache,
Hi NG.
I has here the current Apache 2.040 for Win32.
With compile of the last mod_perl2 version, get I the following error
message.
#-#-#-#-##-#-#-#-#-#-#-#
cl -IG:/cygwin/tmp/modperl5/src/modules/perl -IG:/cygwin/tmp/modperl5/xs
-IG:\Apache2/include -nologo -O1 -MD -DNDEBUG -DWIN32
On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Goehring, Chuck Mr., RCI - San Diego wrote:
> Randy,
>
> I'm using Perl 5.6.0 for this. Should I be using 5.8.0? Does
> that affect ModuleConfig.c?
There may be some advantages to using 5.8.0 with mod_perl-2 on
Win32, but 5.6.1 should be fine with mod_perl-1.
>
> Having
Ken Y. Clark wrote:
> As for this and Perrin's comment about parsing on your own, the point
> is that you've written a lot of code that has already been written and
> debugged by a lot of really smart people. There's no reason for you
> to be reading STDIN and spliting and all that. If you're us
On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Michael Drons wrote:
> Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 07:46:16 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Michael Drons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> darren chamberlain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: variables
Sorry, There is a my in front of the ($cookie,$user)
code. I am confused about your second statement about
parsing the input. What should I be doing? Do you
mean I should use $r->read($content,
$r->header_in('Content-length'))? to read in the
variables?
I use the AuthCookie modules to set t
darren chamberlain wrote:
> Make those global symbols ($cookie, $user, and $hash) lexical (declare
> with my) and the code will both compile and do what you expect (i.e.,
> not maintain values from call to call).
That's what I was thinking too. Also, it's really not a good idea to do
your own p
Hi darren
Did you try starting apache with "httpd -X". It spawns only one process and that helps keep things in order, as far as variable values. You can try trouble shooting with that.
darren chamberlain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
* Michael Drons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[2002-08-13 01:55]:> Thanks fo
* Michael Drons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-13 01:55]:
> Thanks for the link. I actually don't use functions.
> Everything is mostly in MAIN. Here is a snip of code:
>
> #!/usr/bin/perl -wT
> use strict;
> print "";
> my $r = Apache->request;
> $r->content_type("text/html");
> $r->status(200);
A new version (1.41) of OpenInteract has been released to
CPAN. OpenInteract is an extensible web application server built on
Apache, mod_perl, the Template Toolkit and SPOPS object persistence.
This is a fairly minor upgrade -- a few bugfixes and refactorings,
plus the ability to use a centraliz
I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong...
But, variables in the initial section (ie outside of a function) in the main
package will stay in scope all the time. This means that it will retain the
value from a previous request- which might be giving you these problems.
As Perrin Harkins wr
Gerald:
if you check the source of the Smb implemenation of the module, you would
see that it performs basically the same function as NTLM. I agree with you
that it does not fit the Microsoft definition of NTLM, so it is not a NTLM
implementation. If ones purpose is to pass the protection by prov
> You may check Apache::Access module at http://modperl.home.att.net in
which
> I tried to provide a general solution to several popular authentication
> issuers such as SMB, LDAP, IMAP, NIS, FTP, LWP and DBI etc.
>
I think you missed the point (or I missunderstood your module): The problem
is
29 matches
Mail list logo
