One important thing
THERE IS ALREADY A P5EE MAILING LIST GUYS!!
:)
So basically if you want to add your feedback, go there! It's already done
but it's not too late to add feedback. :)
email ...
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 08:36 AM 10/29/2001, Medi Montaseri wrote:
>Similarly, this concept of
> At 02:28 PM 10/23/2001 -0400, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> >Stephen Adkins wrote:
> >> If no one suggests an appropriate list, I propose starting a "p2ee" group
> >Can I just say that P2EE is a horrible, horrible name? It includes the
> >Java version number (when is J3EE coming out?), as well as
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I'm surprised that no one has, jokingly, suggested PEE.
>
> Sorry, couldn't resist. :)
Neither could these people: http://pee.sourceforge.net/
At 03:38 AM 10/24/2001, Stephen Adkins wrote:
>At 02:28 PM 10/23/2001 -0400, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> >Stephen Adkins wrote:
> >
> >> If no one suggests an appropriate list, I propose starting a "p2ee" group
> >
> >
> >Can I just say that P2EE is a horrible, horrible name? It includes the
> >Java
I'm surprised that no one has, jokingly, suggested PEE.
Sorry, couldn't resist. :)
--
===
"If you put three drops of poison into a 100 percent pure Java, you get - Windows. If
you put a few drops of Java into Windows, you s
"Robert Landrum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... A name is pretty important
> and if it's acronym isn't easily recognized, it isn't going to gain
> the support of developers. J2EE is catchy, so we need something
> catchy. PEF isn't nearly as catchy as P2EE or P5EE or PEA (Perl
> Enterprise API)
At 3:38 PM -0400 10/23/01, Stephen Adkins wrote:
>Several of you have made the same good point.
>And now the naming flame war has already begun... ;-)
This is a discussion. Something has been proposed and it needs a
name. I'd hardly call this a flame war. A name is pretty important
and if i
At 02:28 PM 10/23/2001 -0400, Perrin Harkins wrote:
>Stephen Adkins wrote:
>
>> If no one suggests an appropriate list, I propose starting a "p2ee" group
>
>
>Can I just say that P2EE is a horrible, horrible name? It includes the
>Java version number (when is J3EE coming out?), as well as Sun's
List
Subject: Re: [OT] P2EE Redux was: Excellent article on Apache/mod_perl at
eToys
Stephen Adkins wrote:
> If no one suggests an appropriate list, I propose starting a "p2ee" group
Can I just say that P2EE is a horrible, horrible name? It includes the
Java version number
Stephen Adkins wrote:
> If no one suggests an appropriate list, I propose starting a "p2ee" group
Can I just say that P2EE is a horrible, horrible name? It includes the
Java version number (when is J3EE coming out?), as well as Sun's
desperate attempt to make it sound like something you buy
Stephen Adkins writes:
> That would be great (as long as perl.org can host the CVS too).
> My concern was that perl.org might not be as specialized in hosting
> development teams as sourceforge.net. Do you support "viewcvs"
> or similar for web browsing of the CVS repository?
cvsweb. You can se
Nathan,
At 11:06 AM 10/23/2001 -0600, Nathan Torkington wrote:
>Stephen Adkins writes:
>> If no one suggests an appropriate list, I propose starting a "p2ee" group
>> on SourceForge. This gives us mailing lists and a CVS repository for the
>> artifacts of the effort (which will mostly be specifi
On Tuesday 23 October 2001 18:21, Stephen Adkins wrote:
> This issue of a P2EE specification has come up before
> (and I participated in the discussion), but since it is off-topic for
> the mod_perl list, I would appreciate some referrals of where to go to
> discuss this.
>
> If no one suggests an
Stephen Adkins writes:
> If no one suggests an appropriate list, I propose starting a "p2ee" group
> on SourceForge. This gives us mailing lists and a CVS repository for the
> artifacts of the effort (which will mostly be specifications and
> documentation, with maybe some Bundle files). I would
At 11:27 PM 10/23/2001 +0800, Gunther Birznieks wrote:
>At 09:45 PM 10/23/2001, Perrin Harkins wrote:
>>Matt Sergeant wrote:
>>>OK, so what are we missing?
...
>>Based on the comments I've seen here over the years, and some on Slashdot,
>>the thing that seems to worry people the most is the lack
15 matches
Mail list logo