On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, Paul Lindner wrote:
BTW -- I think where the docs are cached should be configurable. I don't
like the idea of the document root writable by the web process.
That's the price you pay for this functionality. Because we use
Apache's native file serving code we need a
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 01:50:52AM -0800, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote:
On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, Paul Lindner wrote:
BTW -- I think where the docs are cached should be configurable. I don't
like the idea of the document root writable by the web process.
That's the price you pay for this
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 02:31:36AM -0800, Paul Lindner wrote:
Right. A more elaborate Apache::CacheContent would have a filename
hash function, and a separate cache directory structure along the
lines of Cache::FileCache.
Just curious -- any reason not to use Cache::Cache as the persistance
Paul Lindner wrote:
[snip]
I suppose that one could put the whole uri-cachefile mapping into a
custom PerlTransHandler and leave Apache::CacheContent as-is..
yeah, I think that we're starting to talk about two different
approaches now. the cool thing about the current logic is that no
Hi,
I would like to propose a new Apache module before I send it off to
CPAN. The name chosen is Apache::CacheContent.
It's pretty generic code, and is intended to be subclassed. It
handles the gory details of caching a page to disk and serving it up
until it expires.
It's derived from
I would like to propose a new Apache module before I send it off to
CPAN. The name chosen is Apache::CacheContent.
This is very cool. I was planning to write one of these, and now I don't
have to. Your implementation is short and interesting. I was planning to
do it with a PerlFixupHandler
At 08:19 AM 12/06/01 -0800, Paul Lindner wrote:
Ok, hit me over the head. Why wouldn't you want to use a caching proxy?
BTW -- I think where the docs are cached should be configurable. I don't
like the idea of the document root writable by the web process.
Bill Moseley
mailto:[EMAIL
On Thu, 06 Dec 2001 10:04:26 -0800
Bill Moseley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW -- I think where the docs are cached should be configurable. I don't
like the idea of the document root writable by the web process.
Maybe:
Alias /cached /tmp/cache
--
Tatsuhiko Miyagawa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 6 Dec 2001 08:19:09 -0800
Paul Lindner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've attached a README below. To download it go to
http://www.modperlcookbook.org/code.html
Nice one. here's a patch to make the sample code work :)
--- CacheContent.pm~Thu Dec 6 22:11:35 2001
+++ CacheContent.pm
On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, Paul Lindner wrote:
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 10:04:26AM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
At 08:19 AM 12/06/01 -0800, Paul Lindner wrote:
Ok, hit me over the head. Why wouldn't you want to use a caching proxy?
Apache::CacheContent gives you more control over the caching
At 10:33 AM 12/06/01 -0800, Paul Lindner wrote:
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 10:04:26AM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
At 08:19 AM 12/06/01 -0800, Paul Lindner wrote:
Ok, hit me over the head. Why wouldn't you want to use a caching proxy?
Apache::CacheContent gives you more control over the caching
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 10:47:35AM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
Ok, hit me over the head. Why wouldn't you want to use a caching proxy?
Apache::CacheContent gives you more control over the caching process
and keeps the expiration headers from leaking to the browser.
Ok, I see.
Or maybe
On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, Paul Lindner wrote:
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 10:04:26AM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
At 08:19 AM 12/06/01 -0800, Paul Lindner wrote:
Ok, hit me over the head. Why wouldn't you want to use a caching proxy?
Apache::CacheContent gives you more control over the caching
Hello,
PLThat's the price you pay for this functionality. Because we use
PLApache's native file serving code we need a url-directory mapping
PLsomewhere.
PL
PLOf course you don't need to make the entire docroot writable, just the
PLdirectory corresponding to your script.
Apologies if this is
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 12:55:25PM -0800, Andrew Ho wrote:
Hello,
PLThat's the price you pay for this functionality. Because we use
PLApache's native file serving code we need a url-directory mapping
PLsomewhere.
PL
PLOf course you don't need to make the entire docroot writable, just the
15 matches
Mail list logo
