Re: [RFC] web-messaging application for mod_perl

2003-07-16 Thread James G Smith
Adi Fairbank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On, or in the near vicinity of Tue, 15 Jul 2003 01:47:13 -0500 >Ok, I'm sold. Now I get the reason for not using such a generic name. > >In fact, I really like your suggestion Apache::App::Mercury. If you don't mind, >I'll use that name! Do you mind? Gla

Re: [RFC] web-messaging application for mod_perl

2003-07-16 Thread Adi Fairbank
On, or in the near vicinity of Tue, 15 Jul 2003 01:47:13 -0500 James G Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has thus written: > Adi Fairbank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Here are the possibilities: > > > > 1 Apache::WebMessaging > > 2 Apache::App::WebMessaging > > 3 Apache::SomeOtherUniqueName (e.g. Serv

Re: [RFC] web-messaging application for mod_perl

2003-07-15 Thread John Saylor
hi ( 03.07.14 20:14 -0700 ) Adi Fairbank: > ( I wouldn't want to have any piece of software named after me... just > my personal style. Software lives for too long, especially open > source. It would still be called that long after I'm dead. ) don't be too sure. no one may call it anything at a

Re: [RFC] web-messaging application for mod_perl

2003-07-15 Thread Stas Bekman
Adi Fairbank wrote: On, or in the near vicinity of Mon, 14 Jul 2003 18:49:58 +0300 Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has thus written: Probably the best bet is to give it some cool unique name, like Apache::AdiChat and then you are all set, since you are not going to take over [...] What's wrong wi

Re: [RFC] web-messaging application for mod_perl

2003-07-14 Thread James G Smith
Adi Fairbank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On, or in the near vicinity of Mon, 14 Jul 2003 18:49:58 +0300 >Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has thus written: > >> Probably the best bet is to give it some cool unique name, like >> Apache::AdiChat and then you are all set, since you are not going to ta

Re: [RFC] web-messaging application for mod_perl

2003-07-14 Thread Adi Fairbank
On, or in the near vicinity of Mon, 14 Jul 2003 18:49:58 +0300 Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has thus written: > > Probably the best bet is to give it some cool unique name, like > Apache::AdiChat and then you are all set, since you are not going to take over > > any future framework/namespac

Re: [RFC] web-messaging application for mod_perl

2003-07-14 Thread Stas Bekman
Adi Fairbank wrote: On, or in the near vicinity of Tue, 1 Jul 2003 11:23:00 +0200 Enrico Sorcinelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has thus spoken: On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 12:57:00 -0700 Adi Fairbank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Apache::WebMessaging I am about ready to release an intraserver web-messaging applic

Re: [RFC] web-messaging application for mod_perl

2003-07-01 Thread Adi Fairbank
On, or in the near vicinity of Tue, 1 Jul 2003 11:23:00 +0200 Enrico Sorcinelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has thus spoken: > On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 12:57:00 -0700 > Adi Fairbank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Apache::WebMessaging > > > > I am about ready to release an intraserver web-messaging applicat

Re: [RFC] web-messaging application for mod_perl

2003-07-01 Thread Enrico Sorcinelli
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 12:57:00 -0700 Adi Fairbank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Apache::WebMessaging > > I am about ready to release an intraserver web-messaging application for > mod_perl. A brief description of the app follows; I'd like to hear some > comments from the mod_perl/Perl/P5EE communit

[RFC] web-messaging application for mod_perl

2003-06-30 Thread Adi Fairbank
Apache::WebMessaging I am about ready to release an intraserver web-messaging application for mod_perl. A brief description of the app follows; I'd like to hear some comments from the mod_perl/Perl/P5EE community on: * is there anything like this already out there? * namespace suggestions (if