Re: 0 being appended to non mod_perl scripts.

2002-03-22 Thread Dave Hodgkinson
Per Einar Ellefsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I suspect that you don't get the 0 from static files, or anything > which sends a Content-Length header. Look more into the raw > transmitted data, and you might find out something. Might it be an HTTP/1.1 KeepAlive artefact? -- David Hodgkinson

RE: 0 being appended to non mod_perl scripts.

2002-03-22 Thread Per Einar Ellefsen
At 14:48 22.03.2002 -0500, Mike Wille wrote: >Well, after much testing, I've found the problem does not lie with mod_perl. >I'm not sure of the source now, I just know how to recreate it. Originally >it seemed like mod_perl but it was just a coincidence that it the problem >started after making s

RE: 0 being appended to non mod_perl scripts.

2002-03-22 Thread Mike Wille
ROTECTED] Subject: Re: 0 being appended to non mod_perl scripts. Randal L. Schwartz wrote: >>>>>>"Mike" == Mike Wille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>>>> > > Mike> I am encountering a wierd problem where perl scripts running under a normal >

Re: 0 being appended to non mod_perl scripts.

2002-03-22 Thread Jeffrey W. Baker
On Thu, 2002-03-21 at 08:37, Mike Wille wrote: > Hello all, > > I apologize if this has already been answered elsewhere, I haven't been able > to find it. > > I am encountering a wierd problem where perl scripts running under a normal > cgi-bin (ie no mod_perl) have a '0' appended to the output.

Re: 0 being appended to non mod_perl scripts.

2002-03-21 Thread Stas Bekman
Randal L. Schwartz wrote: >>"Mike" == Mike Wille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Mike> I am encountering a wierd problem where perl scripts running under a normal > Mike> cgi-bin (ie no mod_perl) have a '0' appended to the output. > > I've seen this happen when people mistakenly write:

Re: 0 being appended to non mod_perl scripts.

2002-03-21 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
> "Mike" == Mike Wille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Mike> I am encountering a wierd problem where perl scripts running under a normal Mike> cgi-bin (ie no mod_perl) have a '0' appended to the output. I've seen this happen when people mistakenly write: print system "foo"; instead of

Re: 0 being appended to non mod_perl scripts.

2002-03-21 Thread Stas Bekman
[reminder: keep replies CC'ed to the list! Thanks] Mike Wille wrote: > Thanks for the suggestion, but I mentioned earlier that mod_perl is not > running these scripts appended with a 0. Everything in cgi-bin which > includes everything with a 0 appended is being run under mod_cgi. As I suggeste

Re: 0 being appended to non mod_perl scripts.

2002-03-21 Thread Stas Bekman
27;0' and is executed by httpd. > > - Mike > > -Original Message- > From: darren chamberlain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 11:49 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: 0 being appended to non mod_perl scripts. > > >

RE: 0 being appended to non mod_perl scripts.

2002-03-21 Thread Ged Haywood
Hi there, On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, Mike Wille wrote: [snip,snip] > I checked to see if mod_perl was handling the scripts that sent the '0' but > perl is indeed handling them and not httpd. I'm not sure I understand what you're saying here. > The server is running Apache 1.3.20. I'm not sure how t

RE: 0 being appended to non mod_perl scripts.

2002-03-21 Thread Mike Wille
t have the '0' and is executed by httpd. - Mike -Original Message- From: darren chamberlain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 11:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 0 being appended to non mod_perl scripts. Quoting Mike Wille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g

0 being appended to non mod_perl scripts.

2002-03-21 Thread Mike Wille
Hello all, I apologize if this has already been answered elsewhere, I haven't been able to find it. I am encountering a wierd problem where perl scripts running under a normal cgi-bin (ie no mod_perl) have a '0' appended to the output. This does not happen to scripts run under mod_perl. It als