If you ax version numbers now, what happens if someone who already has
a versioned copy of ApacheHandler installed asks CPAN to upgrade it?
Will it conclude that it already has the most up to date version? For
that matter, if another CPAN module simply lists H::M::AH as a
dependency (as opposed
On Thursday, 2002-08-01 at 18:06:29 -0400, Perrin Harkins wrote:
Dave Rolsky wrote:
It can, but I'm not sure what to update it to. Frankly, I think CPAN is
more at fault here given that _many_ people use CVS for this sort of stuff
and this quite normal when using CVS.
It's not CPAN, it's
DR == Dave Rolsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DR See, that's the problem. We're up in the hundreds. Maybe we
should've
DR started formatting these with '%04d' way back when but that certainly
DR wouldn't help now.
How 'bout removing Mason 1.05 from CPAN? Or are there too many apps
that
On Saturday, August 3, 2002, at 03:44 AM, Lupe Christoph wrote:
Larry was anticipating a long line of Perl 5 versions... (Yes, I know
$] is deprecated. But $^V does not print easily. And vector version
numbers are not compatible with 5.005 and earlier, so CPAN modules
avoid them.)
Not only
On 1 Aug 2002, Vivek Khera wrote:
Cool... I just updated one system from 1.05 to 1.1201 and cpan says
that HTML::Mason::ApacheHandler is now older than the version in 1.05:
Package namespace installedlatest in CPAN file
HTML::Mason::ApacheHandler 1.242 1.68
On Thursday, August 1, 2002, at 01:43 PM, Dave Rolsky wrote:
It can, but I'm not sure what to update it to. Frankly, I think CPAN is
more at fault here given that _many_ people use CVS for this sort of stuff
and this quite normal when using CVS.
No, CVS is kind-of brain-dead about this. I
On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, David Wheeler wrote:
No, CVS is kind-of brain-dead about this. I suggest you use sprintf to
properly format the version number with appropriate number of 0s.
Although, with those version numbers, it might be a little late.
See, that's the problem. We're up in the
On Thursday, August 1, 2002, at 02:11 PM, Dave Rolsky wrote:
See, that's the problem. We're up in the hundreds. Maybe we should've
started formatting these with '%04d' way back when but that certainly
wouldn't help now.
I've given up on letting CVS set $VERSION, for just this reason. It's
DR == Dave Rolsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DR See, that's the problem. We're up in the hundreds. Maybe we should've
DR started formatting these with '%04d' way back when but that certainly
DR wouldn't help now.
How 'bout removing Mason 1.05 from CPAN? Or are there too many apps
that
Dave Rolsky wrote:
It can, but I'm not sure what to update it to. Frankly, I think CPAN is
more at fault here given that _many_ people use CVS for this sort of stuff
and this quite normal when using CVS.
This is a common complaint about CPAN.pm, but it's kept this way so far
because of
Dave Rolsky wrote:
This release has a number of important improvements and it is highly
recommended that anyone use Mason 1.10 or 1.11 upgrade immediately in
order to fix a nasty memory leak in ApacheHandler. 1.12 is also quite a
bit faster than previous 1.1x versions.
Some quick
This release has a number of important improvements and it is highly
recommended that anyone use Mason 1.10 or 1.11 upgrade immediately in
order to fix a nasty memory leak in ApacheHandler. 1.12 is also quite a
bit faster than previous 1.1x versions.
Those folks still using 1.0x or earlier
12 matches
Mail list logo
