On Sat, 26 Aug 2000, Rod Butcher wrote:
I am looking to migrate a small modperl-based webhosting and ISP service
from NT to some flavour of Linux. Are any particularly modperl-friendly or
unfriendly or are they all much the same ? I'm fairly comfortable with
Redhat, but I hear stories of
Also, another piece of advice for what it's worth. If your going to
add SSL, build and test apache with mod-perl first, and then go back
and add SSL. There may well be a work-around that I'm not aware of,
but basically the problem is that mod-ssl is looking for an encryption
key on
On Sat, 26 Aug 2000, Rob Tanner wrote:
RedHat is as good or bad as any of the distributions. Redhat is not my
personal preference -- and note, I said preference. I don't back my
opinion with lots of objective data because that's a subjective
valuation. I've been using Caldera, but I've
--On 08/26/00 18:51:31 +0200 Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Heh, obviously you have to supply the password on the server startup,
unless you use one of the workarounds described in the ssl docs
(secured utility that feeds the passwd is the best IMHO).
Naw, something else is
Well, the legal troubles should be outlined in the mod_ssl docs. I think it
just has to do with using the rsa_ref libraries because of a patent held in
the USA. But I haven't looked at it lately.
In theory you're supposed to get a license to use it. When you buy
StrongHold or another
At 11:31 AM 8/26/00 -0700, Rob Tanner wrote:
--On 08/26/00 18:51:31 +0200 Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Heh, obviously you have to supply the password on the server startup,
unless you use one of the workarounds described in the ssl docs
(secured utility that feeds the passwd is the
