Re: Apache::SimpleTemplate (don't do it!)

2001-07-10 Thread Joachim Zobel
At 20:19 09.07.01 +0200, you wrote: >It's your decision, but I think you waste your time while you make all the >experiences the other had made during the last 3-5 years. I think it would >more helpfull if you help to improve the other modules (for example makeing >them easier to install etc.) >

Re: Apache::SimpleTemplate (don't do it!)

2001-07-10 Thread Patrick
On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 02:07:21PM -0400, Perrin Harkins took time to write: > > I think that CGI::FastTemplate does all of that. > > Please have a look at it, and see if everything you need is not > > already in it. > > It's a good module for CGI, since it doesn't rely on caching/compiling > tec

Re: Apache::SimpleTemplate (don't do it!)

2001-07-09 Thread Robin Berjon
On Monday 09 July 2001 20:19, Gerald Richter wrote: > > to clarify what i mean by 'simple': > > - trivial to install and to use > > That's important Tough some are easy to use and hard to install :) The latter is less important imho, when a module is hard to install it's usually justified someh

Re: Apache::SimpleTemplate (don't do it!)

2001-07-09 Thread Gerald Richter
> > to clarify what i mean by 'simple': > - trivial to install and to use That's important > - small disk footprint > < 10 modules total. preferably 1 disks are cheap, so it doesn't matter if you take one or two MB > - small memory footprint > this is usually the first bottleneck i see wit

Re: Apache::SimpleTemplate (don't do it!)

2001-07-09 Thread Perrin Harkins
> I think that CGI::FastTemplate does all of that. > Please have a look at it, and see if everything you need is not > already in it. It's a good module for CGI, since it doesn't rely on caching/compiling techniques, just simple regex stuff. It will use a lot less RAM than tools that compile in-

Re: Apache::SimpleTemplate (don't do it!)

2001-07-09 Thread Patrick
On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 12:00:58PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] took time to write: > to clarify what i mean by 'simple': > - trivial to install and to use > - small disk footprint > < 10 modules total. preferably 1 > - small memory footprint > this is usually the first bottleneck i see with > m

Re: Apache::SimpleTemplate (don't do it!)

2001-07-09 Thread Robert Landrum
>hi, i'm sure many of us have had situations like this, >but that doesn't mean that everyone who wants to do >some templating is going to fall into the same trap >every time. The problem is that not every feature comes off looking like a trap. >- trivial to install and to use It's rare that I

Re: Apache::SimpleTemplate (don't do it!)

2001-07-09 Thread peter
hi, i'm sure many of us have had situations like this, but that doesn't mean that everyone who wants to do some templating is going to fall into the same trap every time. to clarify what i mean by 'simple': - trivial to install and to use - small disk footprint < 10 modules total. preferably 1

Re: Apache::SimpleTemplate (don't do it!)

2001-07-08 Thread Robert Landrum
>Yes. Writing a templating system in Perl is trivial. Writing a >*useful* templating system in Perl is demonstratably hard. I too have written a templating system. About a year ago I wrote a simple module called dbq.pm. It performed database queries. Basically, you could mock up a simple ht