On Mon, 28 Jul 2003, Erik Browaldh wrote:
I have written a program that takes argument from html-formula
and read and write it to a textfile.
When I tried it with perl mod 2, under windows with apache it
doesnt work anymore. No new entries are written to the
log-file.txt Ive tried chmod,
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003, Erik Browaldh wrote:
I have written a program that takes argument from html-formula
and read and write it to a textfile.
When I tried it with perl mod 2, under windows with apache it
doesnt work anymore. No new entries are written to the
log-file.txt Ive
Hello everyone!
I have written a program that takes argument from html-formula and read and
write it to a textfile.
When I tried it with perl mod 2, under windows with
apache it doesnt work anymore.
No new entries are written to the log-file.txt
Ive tried chmod, especially r/w accesses
but that
Hello everybody,
I am new to the list. I have a question I hope you can help me with. It is
not a modperl question, just a normal perl question related to Apache/CGI.
I have this script which forks off a process which does something. I already
encountered the problem of my browser waiting for
: Marco Kleefman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: vrijdag 2 november 2001 14:30
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fork/CGI/Apache problem
I have this script which forks off a process which does
something.
Somehow all print statements in my script which occur before
the fork-part
of the script
When I start code from command line it works perfectly on the both computers.
Any ideas?
open TEST, c:/gateway/rus/17.shtml;
open TEST, c:/gateway/rus/17.shtml or
die Can't read 17.shtml because of $!;
Dear all!
I have 2 servers:
1.
w2k server
2.
w2k
professional
with _same_ hardware and same Apache httpd.conf files.
I use mod_perl.
When I use followed script on SERVER
it works with ANY files
When I use it on PROF perl stops
without any error when size of 17.shtml
Hi there,
Mail to your address keeps coming back with fatal errors, so I'm
sending this to the mod_perl List in the hope that we have more luck.
73,
Ged.
On Wed, 26 Jan 2000, Mail Delivery Subsystem wrote:
The original message was received at Wed, 26 Jan 2000 08:59:57 GMT
from ged@localhost