I have a opportunity to upgrade and standardize a couple of mod_perl
enabled servers to the most stable configuration as of now. Apache 1.3
and mod_perl was easy to choose since it is a production environment.
What I am very much confused is to what should I chose for the
distribution. For various
Hi there,
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Mithun Bhattacharya wrote:
I have a choice between the very well tested 7.3 but highly likely
to become unsupported by RedHat soon. Or I could go for RedHat 9.0
A distribution is just a package of stuff that you could put together
yourself if you had the time
--- Ged Haywood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Mithun Bhattacharya wrote:
I have a choice between the very well tested 7.3 but highly likely
to become unsupported by RedHat soon. Or I could go for RedHat 9.0
Ohh no no one is using RedHat support it is just the
Hi there,
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Mithun Bhattacharya wrote:
[snip]
RedHat 7.3 has the notorious gcc 2.96 - no body has been able to
figure out whether it is actually broken or not I guess :).
[snip]
Whether it's broken or not it was never released, it escaped. :)
The developers called it a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 16 June 2003 05:02, Mithun Bhattacharya wrote:
I have a opportunity to upgrade and standardize a couple of mod_perl
enabled servers to the most stable configuration as of now. Apache 1.3
and mod_perl was easy to choose since it is a
Mithun Bhattacharya wrote:
I have a opportunity to upgrade and standardize a couple of mod_perl
enabled servers to the most stable configuration as of now. Apache 1.3
and mod_perl was easy to choose since it is a production environment.
What I am very much confused is to what should I chose for
