Re: Doc clarifications requested

2003-03-13 Thread Perrin Harkins
Stas Bekman wrote: Ron Savage wrote: I see this item: if one wishes to simply read POST data, there is the more modern {setup,should,get}_client_block API, and even more modern filter API. Along with continued support for read(STDIN, ...) and $r-read($buf, $r-headers_in-{'content-length'}) I feel

Re: Doc clarifications requested

2003-03-13 Thread Stas Bekman
Perrin Harkins wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: Ron Savage wrote: I see this item: if one wishes to simply read POST data, there is the more modern {setup,should,get}_client_block API, and even more modern filter API. Along with continued support for read(STDIN, ...) and $r-read($buf,

Doc clarifications requested

2003-03-12 Thread Ron Savage
Folks (1) On this page: http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/user/compat/compat.html Under this heading: $r-args in an Array Context I see this item: if one wishes to simply read POST data, there is the more modern {setup,should,get}_client_block API, and even more modern filter API. Along with

Re: Doc clarifications requested

2003-03-12 Thread Stas Bekman
Ron Savage wrote: Folks (1) On this page: http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/user/compat/compat.html Under this heading: $r-args in an Array Context Why not using a direct pointer ;) http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/user/compat/compat.html#C__r_E_gt_args__in_an_Array_Context I see this item: if one

Re: Doc clarifications requested

2003-03-12 Thread Stas Bekman
(c) Would it be possible to add a reference for is_initial_req? Let's try to keep this document is simple as possible. Think of it as a temporary helper map to find out what happened to some mp1 method that is not there anymore, or working differently. Remember that eventually, people won't