]- I'm not sure but I think phttpd is included in RH6.2
Wow..., you're right. What a trip. Okay, I'm going to grab the srpm
for RH's site, and extract it into a tarball. It'll be on my anonymous
ftp under the pub/matofali directory if anyone's interested.
Thanks,
Shane.
(Thanks BTW :-)
hi,
My question is instead of using two Apache servers OR Apache+proxy scenario
(static vs dynamic pages) will it be possible to leave static pages to kHTTPD
and run only one APACHE server.
Did someone tried it...
Thanx
=
iVAN
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=
On Mon, May 15, 2000 at 09:48:07AM -0700, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
On Mon, 15 May 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 15, 2000 at 04:37:06PM -0400, raptor wrote:
hi,
My question is instead of using two Apache servers OR Apache+proxy scenario
(static vs dynamic pages) will
I noticed that all the phhttpd pages have disappeared. What's up?
Hmm.., you are right. Well..., Zach doesn't work for redhat anymore.
I don't have a copy of the latest source..., well, I do, but it's
riddled with my own changes. I was wondering when they were going to
take down his
On Mon, 15 May 2000, raptor wrote:
My question is instead of using two Apache servers OR Apache+proxy scenario
(static vs dynamic pages) will it be possible to leave static pages to kHTTPD
and run only one APACHE server.
It will, but you're missing part of the benefit from the proxy
On Mon, May 15, 2000 at 12:20:19PM -0700, Perrin Harkins wrote:
On Mon, 15 May 2000, raptor wrote:
My question is instead of using two Apache servers OR Apache+proxy scenario
(static vs dynamic pages) will it be possible to leave static pages to kHTTPD
and run only one APACHE server.
On Mon, 15 May 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
These httpd static accelerators do 100 times better than apache does.
I don't believe that's true.
And it doesn't change Perrin's point (that apache is sufficient for most
pipes anyway).
- ask
--
ask bjoern hansen -
It was an overstatement in my Zeal :-). Clearly not. Up to maybe
10x. That's the best improvement I've ever seen. But...,
realistically with a well tuned apache vs. a well tuned static
accelerator, probably 4x is tops. (Sorry :-) Static accels handle
the thundering herd problem better as
"r" == raptor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
r My question is instead of using two Apache servers OR Apache+proxy
r scenario (static vs dynamic pages) will it be possible to leave
r static pages to kHTTPD and run only one APACHE server. Did
r someone tried it...
Even without knowing what
