On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 10:03:04AM -0700, Jonathan Hilgeman wrote:
> Now, I'm assuming that Apache has full access to these incoming packets.
> Therefore, they must also have access to this invisible identifier. Is it
> possible to extract that identifier somehow by tinkering with Apache?
Most NA
privacy.
DESCEND SOAPBOX
Joe Breeden
--
Sent from my Outlook 2000 Wired Deskheld (www.microsoft.com)
-Original Message-
From: Alex Porras
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 2:38 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Concepts of Unique Tracking
Although I ag
ge-
> From: Stephen Adkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 1:14 PM
> To: Jonathan Hilgeman; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: Concepts of Unique Tracking
>
>
>
> How quickly we forget ...
>
> Don't we remember the huge outcr
How quickly we forget ...
Don't we remember the huge outcry over Intel putting a unique ID in every
CPU which would could be transmitted via web browser and destroy all of our
privacy?
The frustration we feel as programmers who are trying to identify anonymous
visitors
is exactly what privacy i
an
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: Concepts of Unique Tracking
JH> Let's take over the world and recompile all browsers to have them send
out
JH> the MAC address of thet network card.
.. and if I'm dialup user :)
JH> Jonathan
JH> -Original Message-
May 25, 2001 10:42 AM
JH> To: Jonathan Hilgeman
JH> Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
JH> Subject: Re: Concepts of Unique Tracking
JH> Jonathan Hilgeman wrote:
>>
>> What about client-specific information available in Javascript, like
JH> screen
>> resolution, size
27;
Subject: Re: Concepts of Unique Tracking
Jonathan Hilgeman wrote:
>
> What about client-specific information available in Javascript, like
screen
> resolution, size, etc...? Can that be accessed by tinkering with Apache a
> bit, or is it something only available because of the bro
Jonathan Hilgeman wrote:
>
> What about client-specific information available in Javascript, like screen
> resolution, size, etc...? Can that be accessed by tinkering with Apache a
> bit, or is it something only available because of the browser, since
> Javascript is dependent on the browser?
I
: Jonathan Hilgeman
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: Concepts of Unique Tracking
On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 10:03:04AM -0700, Jonathan Hilgeman wrote:
> Now, I'm assuming that Apache has full access to these incoming packets.
> Therefore, they must also have access to this invisi
dependent on the browser?
Jonathan
-Original Message-
From: Wim Kerkhoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 10:15 AM
To: Jonathan Hilgeman
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: Concepts of Unique Tracking
Jonathan Hilgeman wrote:
> Now, I'm assumi
Jonathan Hilgeman wrote:
> Now, I'm assuming that Apache has full access to these incoming packets.
> Therefore, they must also have access to this invisible identifier. Is it
> possible to extract that identifier somehow by tinkering with Apache?
The only thing that you can access from the webse
Jonathan Hilgeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Okay, after I think about it, there must be a way to identify a unique user,
>even if they are behind a firewall. Let's run through this process:
>
>1) Person behind the firewall sends out a request to a web server.
>2) The firewall intercepts that req
12 matches
Mail list logo
