Hi Stas,
On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Stas Bekman wrote:
I see no reason why we should mislead readers, saying do not upgrade to
5.8.0, but to 5.7.2 instead.
I'm sorry if I misled anyone. I thought it was clear that my own
personal recommendation was at least 5.7.2 and that there are those
who would
Hi there,
On Sat, 7 Dec 2002, Richard Clarke wrote:
I seem to have hit a slight stumbling block in my mod_perl development.
[snip]
As you can see from the topic, the segv happens in the DProf library.
Yup, that'll do it.
Try upgrading to Perl 5.7.2 at least. It worked for me.
There are
Ged Haywood wrote:
[...]
Try upgrading to Perl 5.7.2 at least. It worked for me.
There are those who would recommend 5.8.0 minimum, but I'm not one.
(Yet:).
Eh? 5.8.0 is almost the same as 5.7.2, with mucho bugs fixed. I don't
understand why do you suggest to install an unstable developers
Hi Stas,
On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Stas Bekman wrote:
Ged Haywood wrote:
[...]
Try upgrading to Perl 5.7.2 at least. It worked for me.
There are those who would recommend 5.8.0 minimum, but I'm not one.
(Yet:).
Eh? 5.8.0 is almost the same as 5.7.2, with mucho bugs fixed. I don't
Ged Haywood wrote:
Hi Stas,
On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Stas Bekman wrote:
Ged Haywood wrote:
[...]
Try upgrading to Perl 5.7.2 at least. It worked for me.
There are those who would recommend 5.8.0 minimum, but I'm not one.
(Yet:).
Eh? 5.8.0 is almost the same as 5.7.2, with mucho bugs fixed. I
On Sat, 7 Dec 2002 19:58:40 -, Richard Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
RC List,
RC I seem to have hit a slight stumbling block in my mod_perl development.
RC Without wanting to write a whole essay on the exact combination of events
RC that causes this segv to happen I'll just say for now