On Fri, 11 May 2001, Chris Winters wrote:
> > Anyone (including Chris) done a comparison of the two (SPOPS and
> > Tangram) and willing to comment on strengths, weaknesses,
> > differences, etc?
>
> That is an excellent idea and would be quite useful. I'll see what I
> can do in the (relatively)
* Ray Zimmerman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010511 08:01]:
> Using Dave Rolsky's OO-RDBMS vs RDBMS-OO sort of description of
> Tangram and Alzabo, it sounds like SPOPS is more in the same category
> as Tangram, correct?
That's correct. I think Tangram is more of a 'pure' object storage
solution than S
At 12:03 AM -0400 5/11/01, Chris Winters wrote:
>SPOPS is built to map objects to relational databases, or other data
>stores. If you're just getting/setting object properties and
>persistence (create/update/fetch/remove) along with relationships
>among the objects, you don't even need to write an
* Ray Zimmerman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010510 11:39]:
> I'm looking for a good package to use for Object - RDBMS mapping in
> the context of mod_perl and Mason. Something that will handled object
> inheritance and nested objects, etc.
>
> I'm aware of Tangram, Alzabo and SPOPS (not sure all these
Ray Zimmerman wrote:
> I'm looking for a good package to use for Object - RDBMS mapping in the
> context of mod_perl and Mason. Something that will handled object
> inheritance and nested objects, etc.
>
One that I've been meaning to try out when I get a chance is GOODS at:
http://www.ispras
