hello,
I've been off-list for a while, so please forgive (and direct) me if
this is a tired subject.
In short, i'd like to pass through another object on method invocation,
in addition to the apache request. Ideally the (method)handler would
look something like:
sub handler ($$$) {
At 20:47 02.10.2002, william ross wrote:
hello,
I've been off-list for a while, so please forgive (and direct) me if this
is a tired subject.
In short, i'd like to pass through another object on method invocation, in
addition to the apache request. Ideally the (method)handler would look
On Wednesday, October 2, 2002, at 08:18 PM, Per Einar Ellefsen wrote:
At 20:47 02.10.2002, william ross wrote:
but I can't find anything to tell me how to do it. I feel sure I'm
missing something really obvious here?
You can configure objects instead of using static class names. See the
At 21:30 02.10.2002, william ross wrote:
On Wednesday, October 2, 2002, at 08:18 PM, Per Einar Ellefsen wrote:
At 20:47 02.10.2002, william ross wrote:
but I can't find anything to tell me how to do it. I feel sure I'm
missing something really obvious here?
You can configure objects instead
On Wednesday, October 2, 2002, at 08:37 PM, Per Einar Ellefsen wrote:
At 21:30 02.10.2002, william ross wrote:
On Wednesday, October 2, 2002, at 08:18 PM, Per Einar Ellefsen wrote:
At 20:47 02.10.2002, william ross wrote:
but I can't find anything to tell me how to do it. I feel sure I'm
On Wednesday, October 2, 2002, at 09:11 PM, Dave Rolsky wrote:
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, william ross wrote:
sorry: i wasn't very clear, was I? I am using a method handler, but I
want to pass an object of another class to it each time it is called.
The object needs to be created outside of an
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, william ross wrote:
I did have it set up that way at one point. it worked quite nicely as
long as I made the singleton in a subclass of the main Factory (which
might be shared by several applications with different configurations).
i gave up on it in the end because it
On Wednesday, October 2, 2002, at 09:48 PM, Dave Rolsky wrote:
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, william ross wrote:
I did have it set up that way at one point. it worked quite nicely as
long as I made the singleton in a subclass of the main Factory (which
might be shared by several applications with
