; unicode
> support. 5.6.0 has a lot of bugs (witch were fixed in 5.7.0)
>
> Best
> Cb
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jauder Ho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Bogomolnyi Constantin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday
icode
support. 5.6.0 has a lot of bugs (witch were fixed in 5.7.0)
Best
Cb
- Original Message -
From: "Jauder Ho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Bogomolnyi Constantin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 8:44 AM
Subject: Re: perl5.6 (was: Shared variabl
On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Bogomolnyi Constantin wrote:
> You should probably try 5.7.0 witch is much more stable than 5.6.0 (you
> should not try unicode stuff , whitch is quite buggy)
>
> I use 5.7.0 on all my production servers without any problems .
5.7.0 may have fixed some of the bugs of 5.6.0
quot;modperl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2001 6:20 AM
Subject: Re: perl5.6 (was: Shared variables, inner subs and "our")
> Stas Bekman wrote:
>
> > our() and other perl5.6 new APIs are too early to be endorsed, as 5.6 is
> > not yet
On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Wim Kerkhoff wrote:
> Stas Bekman wrote:
>
> > our() and other perl5.6 new APIs are too early to be endorsed, as 5.6 is
> > not yet considered as a stable version for mod_perl production sites,
> > therefore the guide barely touches on it.
>
> Would you recommend the use of p
Stas Bekman wrote:
> our() and other perl5.6 new APIs are too early to be endorsed, as 5.6 is
> not yet considered as a stable version for mod_perl production sites,
> therefore the guide barely touches on it.
Would you recommend the use of perl5.6 with mod_perl? What you are
saying is making m
