Keletso Mokgethi wrote:
i am a novice trying to run a perl script on apache
i created
a directory under httpd called "perl" in which i
stored the script. according to redhat's linux 6.2
apache/ssl documentation, mod_perl is ready to run
once the server is launced and there is no need for
On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Steven Zhu wrote:
[...]
another user (having different user email account). Now I got those emails
from the alias of my original account. If I just send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], I believe that it does not help because [...]
well, you could at least have tried.
then
On 19 Mar 2001, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
"mod_perl: 20 billion hits served"
And turn the "m" into a stylized arch. :)
Nick er, maybe 20 trillion ... ? seeing as how ValueClick alone has done a bit
Nick over 42 billion since 6/98 ... :)
yeah, I was hoping valueclick would jump out and
well, thanks everyone for your suggestions (maybe :)
I just thought I'd sum up some of the issues that we dealt with last year:
o the Eagle and Apache feather are off limits - we didn't get permission
to use them last year and don't expect that to change.
o the shirt is going to have a
Searched this list, dbiusers, and a bunch more.I'm not sure if its
something so dump it's never discussed or what. There is no error message
returned, it just goes back to the httpd 403 error screen. I've added a
print statement in the middle of the connect and had it print to the screen
o unfortunately, we can't get into the biz of selling any. the logistics
of that is just too much.
Maybe using a service like Cafe Press to sell the shirts would
work? http://www.cafepress.com/ I know I'd be interested in purchasing a
shirt.
"Differentiated Software Solutions Pvt. Ltd.," wrote:
I have written two mod_perl programs whose output is same (through
browser).
I want to know what are the difference between them! If there is any
difference then what are the pros and cons in using both of them?
The second program is
-Original Message-
From: Victor Michael Blancas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 10:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: LimitRequestBody
The httpd documentation says that the default LimitRequestBody
configuration is 0. However, i'm only able to upload
On Fri, 9 Mar 2001, Gerd Kortemeyer wrote:
[bugs and design fu^H^Hchoices waiting to happen]
I will open my consulting business on Mon, Jan 18th, 2038.
funny, I thought we all worked so hard to have a chance of retiring
before that.
- ask
--
ask bjoern hansen, http://ask.netcetera.dk/
Geoffrey Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
o unfortunately, we can't get into the biz of selling any. the
logistics
of that is just too much.
What about using a service like www.cafepress.com where you upload the
artwork and they take care of all the logistics: order taking, payment,
-Original Message-
From: David Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 10:24 AM
To: Geoffrey Young; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OT] ApacheCon BOF
Geoffrey Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
o unfortunately, we can't get into the biz of
At 11:27 AM +0800 3/20/01, Stas Bekman wrote:
On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Paul wrote:
--- Geoffrey Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mod_perl digest
March 11, 2001 - March 17, 2001
Recent happenings in the mod_perl world...
. . .
mailing list
It would also be easy enough to upload the artwork from last year.
I'd use the same artwork, but change mod_perl to mod_perl 2.0. Alas, with
all the latest development Doug has done for mod_perl 2.0, it seems that
the release of Apache 2.0 will be the main show stopper. So let's keep the
folks
[the benchmark snipped]
What can we conclude from all of this? That Lexicals and globals run
at (roughly) the same speed, and that tmtowtdi...
... but that doesn't mean that we should endorse using globals. This would
probably be different if globals were significantly faster. Fortunately
At 03:19 AM 3/20/01 -0800, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote:
On Fri, 9 Mar 2001, Gerd Kortemeyer wrote:
[bugs and design fu^H^Hchoices waiting to happen]
I will open my consulting business on Mon, Jan 18th, 2038.
funny, I thought we all worked so hard to have a chance of retiring
before that.
Yeah
I've a note in the guide to check the correctness of the following
section. I have these 2 questions:
1. Should all three headers be always sent?
2. Should $r-no_cache(1) be used for non-2xx responses?
Thanks!
=head1 Cache Control for Regular and Error Modes
To disable the client response
Hi
( 01.03.20 10:36 -0500 ) Geoffrey Young:
still need more suggestions for a theme that aren't tongue-in-cheek,
though :)
But those are the best ones! And puns and other word play are a part of
perl culture!
Also, just for my information, who decides on the theme and how do they
do it?
--
Summary:
The Perl Cache package provides Cache::Cache, a generic interface
for creating persistent data stores. This interface is implemented
by the Cache::MemoryCache, Cache::SharedMemoryCache, Cache::FileCache,
Cache::SizeAwareFileCache, Cache::SizeAwareMemoryCache, and
Unfortunately it is a requirement for this project. We need to parse utf8
XML and munge other XML using that data. I seem to have everything working
now although I had to fix some stuff in XML::DOM.
--Jauder
On Sun, 18 Mar 2001, Bogomolnyi Constantin wrote:
Hi ,
Unicode is a way of pain .
I know a lot of the good O'Rielly books are showing some age (1999
publishing date). Anyone out there have a copy of "Writing Apache
Modules with Perl and C", is it still relevant enough with the
current apache mod_perl distro's to be worthwhile getting?
Suggestions on good reference books
-Original Message-
From: Stas Bekman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 11:44 AM
To: mod_perl list
Subject: no-cache headers?
I've a note in the guide to check the correctness of the following
section. I have these 2 questions:
1. Should all three
-Original Message-
From: Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 12:58 PM
To: Geoffrey Young
Subject: RE: [OT] ApacheCon BOF
--- Geoffrey Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
still need more suggestions for a theme that aren't tongue-in-cheek,
lol! Why,
I have been trying to reduce/tune the memory requirements of an
online game which uses mod_perl (Apache::Registry). I have read the
suggestions at http://perl.apache.org/tuning/ and am trying to follow
them. The first suggestion is to preload the modules by including
Perlrequire
Randal 42 billion has the right sound to it. It's "the answer", after all,
Randal a billion times over. :)
I like it! Maybe a big round pearl with a smiley-face
and a headband with feather sticking up in the back
with the words "Don't Panic" in large friendly letters
printed below :)
"Geoffrey" == Geoffrey Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
still need more suggestions for a theme that aren't tongue-in-cheek,
lol! Why, I thought that was the idea!!!
Geoffrey well, of course - but much folly leaves the list innundated with (albeit
Geoffrey funny) postings but not much for
daniel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said something to this effect on 03/19/2001:
hello all,
i've got a registry script that issues a subrequest for a php page that
issues a subrequest on another registry script.
registry-php-registry
the initial registry script sets:
$r-notes("seen"=
Suggestions on good reference books to get? (I have most of the Perl
library already).
Diving into mod_perl with this new job of mine was certinaly made much easier
with 'Apache modules with perl / C' ... I'd pick it up for reference at the
very least.
_Thomas
Paul Evad wrote:
I know a lot of the good O'Rielly books are showing some age (1999
publishing date). Anyone out there have a copy of "Writing Apache
Modules with Perl and C", is it still relevant enough with the
current apache mod_perl distro's to be worthwhile getting?
Yeah, it still
So as not to be a total spoilsport, I would like to point out that I
thought Randal's idea (Mcmod_perl?) was rather clever and I think it'd be
cool (though I don't know if there are trademark issues).
-dave
/*==
www.urth.org
We await the New Sun
==*/
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
Is anyone aware of a safe to way to do multi-process read/write access
through a dbm module other than BerkeleyDB.pm without tie-ing and
untie-ing every time? I thought that was the only safe thing to do
because of buffering issues, but this seems
Paul Evad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I know a lot of the good O'Rielly books are showing some age (1999
publishing date). Anyone out there have a copy of "Writing Apache
Modules with Perl and C", is it still relevant enough with the
current apache mod_perl distro's to be worthwhile
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, John Mulkerin wrote:
There is no error message returned, it just goes back to the httpd 403
error screen.
What about in the error log? Have you read the DBI docs on how to get
your error message to print? You should either have RaiseError on or be
checking return codes
Paul,
You certainly are correct about the book being a bit dated. But it is still a
great reference, especially for beginners. Even with the book you still must
read the perldocs.
--
Dave Davisson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Paul Evad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I've encounted what I believe to be an error in either a)
FileHandle.pm, b) Perl, or c) Linux 2.2.17.
I'm writing a bulkmailer (for legitimate resons). I dump all the
emails to a file sorted by domain. My parent process begins reading
the file and forks a "domain processor" whenever it
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Dave Rolsky wrote:
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Geoffrey Young wrote:
If you get a really good artist, put the lamp/bottle into the hands of
a well-built Native American figure (a warrior-type is great, but an
"indian princess" has subliminal appealok, ok, but think
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 2:59 PM
To: Geoffrey Young
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: [OT] ApacheCon BOF
"Geoffrey" == Geoffrey Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
still need
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Geoffrey Young wrote:
If you get a really good artist, put the lamp/bottle into the hands of
a well-built Native American figure (a warrior-type is great, but an
"indian princess" has subliminal appealok, ok, but think about it,
lol!)
I think the graphics house
"Geoffrey" == Geoffrey Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Geoffrey sorry Randal - I guess I just found it so funny that I
Geoffrey didn't think you were really serious about it (I saw the big
Geoffrey glowing M and nearly snarfed my coffee :)
As a professional comedian, I *demand* that my name
-Original Message-
From: Dave Rolsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 3:19 PM
To: Geoffrey Young
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [OT] ApacheCon BOF
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Geoffrey Young wrote:
If you get a really good artist, put the
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Tim Gardner wrote:
I understand that the RSS is the resident size in KB and the SZ
column is the size of the process, but what should I be seeing in the
way of reduced memory? The 13MB/18MB is not much different from when
I don't preload anything. Should I be seeing
"Dave" == Dave Rolsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dave So as not to be a total spoilsport, I would like to point out that I
Dave thought Randal's idea (Mcmod_perl?) was rather clever and I think it'd be
Dave cool (though I don't know if there are trademark issues).
Remember. It's a Parody.
Perrin Harkins wrote:
Is anyone aware of a safe to way to do multi-process read/write access
through a dbm module other than BerkeleyDB.pm without tie-ing and
untie-ing every time? I thought that was the only safe thing to do
because of buffering issues, but this seems to be implying that
Ahh. Thanks much.
darren chamberlain wrote:
Nor should it be. You need to set the note in the subrequest, or
access the parent's notes table.
Try replacing the first piece with:
my $subr = $r-lookup_uri('test.php3');
$subr-notes('seen' = $seen);
$subr-run;
And the
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Joshua Chamas wrote:
I know the tie/untie MLDBM::Sync strategy with DB_File is
slow, but what size data are you caching?
I'm not. Well, actually I am, but I use BerkeleyDB which handles its
own locking. I just noticed this in the Guide and figured that either it
was out
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Perrin Harkins wrote:
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
Is anyone aware of a safe to way to do multi-process read/write access
through a dbm module other than BerkeleyDB.pm without tie-ing and
untie-ing every time? I thought that was the only safe thing to
CNET is hiring in Itasca Illinois
Let me introduce myself, my name is sean lally and I am the Director of
Corporate Recruiting for CNET in San Francisco. We now have 11 positions
open in Itasca. Here are the positions I hope to tempt you with:
Director IT-IS
Data Manager
SR Software Engineer
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Geoffrey Young wrote:
For normally generated response use:
$r-header_out("Pragma","no-cache");
$r-header_out("Cache-control","no-cache");
$r-no_cache(1);
$r-no_cache(1) sets these headers for you - no need to set them yourself.
If for some reason you
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
You mean with DB_File? There's a big warning in the current version
saying not to do that, because there is some initial buffering that
happens when opening a database.
The warning says not to lock on dbm fd but an external file!
I think you'll
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Tim Gardner wrote:
I have been trying to reduce/tune the memory requirements of an
online game which uses mod_perl (Apache::Registry). I have read the
suggestions at http://perl.apache.org/tuning/ and am trying to follow
them. The first suggestion is to preload the
Perrin Harkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
I think you'll still have problems with this technique, unless you
tie/untie every time. I'm looking at the perldoc for DB_File version
1.76, at the section titled "Locking: the trouble with fd". At the very
least, you'd have to call sync
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Perrin Harkins wrote:
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
You mean with DB_File? There's a big warning in the current version
saying not to do that, because there is some initial buffering that
happens when opening a database.
The warning says not to lock
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, David Harris wrote:
Perrin Harkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
I think you'll still have problems with this technique, unless you
tie/untie every time. I'm looking at the perldoc for DB_File version
1.76, at the section titled "Locking: the trouble with fd".
thank you Mr Boyle for the help. i have been able to
gain access to the directory, but i still cannot get
any HTML output from the script. the browser just
hangs when i try to access it. i figure the problem
might have to do with the code, and i was wondering if
anyone could help me debug. the
On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Drew Taylor wrote:
snip..
won't be there this year. Speaking of which, will the mod_perl classes have
the handouts available over the web?
i know doug's been updating his:
http://perl.apache.org/~dougm/modperl_2.0.html
sterling
Stas Bekman wrote:
So basically what you are saying is that sync() is broken and shouldn't be
used at all. Something fishy is going on. The purpose of sync() is to
flush the modifications to the disk.
Saving changes to disk isn't the problem. The issue is that some of the
database gets
55 matches
Mail list logo
