Re: Apache::compat was Apache::DBI with mod_perl 2.0

2002-06-27 Thread Zac Morris
: Thursday, June 27, 2002 2:33 AM Subject: Re: Apache::compat was Apache::DBI with mod_perl 2.0 errors: using Apache/2.0.36 (prefork MPM) because you must use 2.0.39. __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl

Re: Apache::compat was Apache::DBI with mod_perl 2.0

2002-06-27 Thread Stas Bekman
Zac Morris wrote: Ok, I went and installed Apache from CVS this time, but it looks like that installed 2.0.40-dev and I'm still getting errors during make test of mod_perl 2. Does it have to be 2.0.39 specifically to compile? Yes, to compile 1.99_04 Sorry if I'm just not getting it...

Re: Apache::compat was Apache::DBI with mod_perl 2.0

2002-06-27 Thread Zac Morris
] To: Zac Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: mod_perl [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 6:08 AM Subject: Re: Apache::compat was Apache::DBI with mod_perl 2.0 Zac Morris wrote: Ok, I went and installed Apache from CVS this time, but it looks like that installed 2.0.40-dev and I'm still

Re: Apache::compat was Apache::DBI with mod_perl 2.0

2002-06-27 Thread Stas Bekman
Zac Morris wrote: Ok, I understand. Maybe some kind of message/logic in the make to tell you that you have to have specifically x, y, z. Because I honestly DID hear you say x, y, z but my brain assumed x+, y+, z+ I've updated the README file, which now states what you need. All the

Re: Apache::compat was Apache::DBI with mod_perl 2.0

2002-06-27 Thread Stas Bekman
Zac Morris wrote: Ok, still getting the same errors during make test. One of the first lines of the perl Makefile.PL --blahblah shows: Configuring Apache/2.0.39 mod_perl/1.99_04 Perl/v5.8.0 Does this mean that the make install I did on the Perl/v5.8.0_RC2 didn't take? may be you