said, I definitely don't want to enlarge the scope even more at
this time. Therefore I think the best solution is to start a separate
document that does various comparisons Embperl vs. Mason, VB/ChilySoft vs.
Apache::ASP etc. Having a section on each comparison sounds like a great
idea.
When
Hi,
I made some pages with Embperl, but I don't know Mason. Yesterday
a friend told me of Mason, but he does not know Embperl very
well. Now I wonder about the pros and cons of each, not only in
respect to performance but also general usability, bugs etc.
What do more experienced web programmers
Hi,
I made some pages with Embperl, but I don't know Mason. Yesterday
a friend told me of Mason, but he does not know Embperl very
well. Now I wonder about the pros and cons of each, not only in
respect to performance but also general usability, bugs etc.
What do more experienced web
Andre Landwehr wrote:
Hi,
I made some pages with Embperl, but I don't know Mason. Yesterday
a friend told me of Mason, but he does not know Embperl very
well. Now I wonder about the pros and cons of each, not only in
respect to performance but also general usability, bugs etc.
What do
hi,
my ignorance on Embperl is about to show;-)) tell me
what would one be looking at to write apps for say the
casios and Pilot 5s in linux? will embedded perl work?
is it the right choice? this to map to web technologies
of course:-))
Regards,
One big difference that I would point out is that despite its name
HTML::Mason, is _much_ less HTML centric than Embperl. It is a bit
mod_perl centric but there is literally nothing HTML specific about it at
all. We've been talking recently about how to expand mason so that it can
be used
On Mon, 14 Feb 2000, Gerald Richter wrote:
all. We've been talking recently about how to expand mason so that it can
be used in any sort of context where you have a request (from STDIN,
email, whatever) for content that you want filled by components.
While you are talking, Embperl can
At 15:17 14-2-2000 -0600, Autarch wrote:
On Mon, 14 Feb 2000, Gerald Richter wrote:
all. We've been talking recently about how to expand mason so that
it can
be used in any sort of context where you have a request (from STDIN,
email, whatever) for content that you want filled by
Well, I haven't used Embperl but I've read the docs a bit and I have some
idea of how it works.
One big difference that I would point out is that despite its name
HTML::Mason, is _much_ less HTML centric than Embperl. It is a bit
mod_perl centric but there is literally nothing HTML
Nothing really to add here, except that since this seems to be a FAQ,
perhaps Stas would be willing to add a section about it that we could
just point to whenever this question comes up? A non-partisan page with
a focus on similarities and links to each site would be ideal.
At 12:39 AM 2/14/00
to enlarge the scope even more at
this time. Therefore I think the best solution is to start a separate
document that does various comparisons Embperl vs. Mason, VB/ChilySoft vs.
Apache::ASP etc. Having a section on each comparison sounds like a great
idea.
When the reconstruction of the guide
11 matches
Mail list logo
