[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for your prompt response!
We did compile Apache with CFLAGS=-D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE
-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 but we're trying to move away from this now,
because of vendors like IBM and Oracle not willing to re-compile (websphere
mods and mod_ossos) with the same flags.
with 'inside information' into mod_perl to comment on this
one...
Thx again,
Jaco Greyling
-Original Message-
From: Ged Haywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 June 2003 14:53
To: Greyling, Jaco
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: non-LFS Apache 1.3.27 w/ LFS Perl 5.8.0 (using mod_perl)
Hi
Hi there,
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My question now is, did Doug take this into consideration when he
build mod_perl v1.27 (w/ PERL_USELARGEFILES=0)
I'm sure Doug took into consideration all sorts of things we never
even thought about. Try it out and let us know what
PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 June 2003 14:45
To: Greyling, Jaco
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: non-LFS Apache 1.3.27 w/ LFS Perl 5.8.0 (using mod_perl)
Hi there,
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My question now is, did Doug take this into consideration when he
build mod_perl v1.27 (w
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 June 2003 03:36
To: Greyling, Jaco
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: non-LFS Apache 1.3.27 w/ LFS Perl 5.8.0 (using mod_perl)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guys,
anyone with experience on the below problem???
why reposting the same question 3 times? Please give
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey
Sorry - it took 30 mins to receive the confirmation (wasn't sure if it went
through successfully the 1st time)...
Anyway, I don't have a BUG to report - all I want to know is, is it SAVE to
run non-LFS Apache with LFS Perl using mod_perl LFS. It
you re-compile
Apache with CFLAGS=-D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64?
Thanks again,
Jaco Greyling
-Original Message-
From: Stas Bekman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 June 2003 10:59
To: Greyling, Jaco
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: non-LFS Apache 1.3.27 w/ LFS Perl
Hi there,
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thus without re-compiling my whole Perl 5.8.0 build I need to come
up with a solution.
I really don't see why you don't recompile your Perl. It's not a big
deal and it's going to be a lot safer that way.
Sorry for my ignorance but it
?
If not then I'll mail Doug and tell him to add a conditional statement :)
Jaco Greyling
-Original Message-
From: Ged Haywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 June 2003 13:06
To: Greyling, Jaco
Cc: mod_perl Mailing List
Subject: RE: non-LFS Apache 1.3.27 w/ LFS Perl 5.8.0 (using mod_perl)
Hi
:)
Jaco Greyling
-Original Message-
From: Ged Haywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 June 2003 14:53
To: Greyling, Jaco
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: non-LFS Apache 1.3.27 w/ LFS Perl 5.8.0 (using mod_perl)
Hi Jaco,
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As you can see
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guys,
anyone with experience on the below problem???
why reposting the same question 3 times? Please give people some time to
respond to your questions, you can't expect an immediate reply.
Please advice, I would really appreciate the help.
[...]
Sorry if this
11 matches
Mail list logo
