Re: RFC: CGI vs. Apache Namespace Question

2001-12-16 Thread Thomas Klausner
Hi! On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 01:44:52PM -0500, darren chamberlain wrote: I didn't even think of that; if Apache is not installed, having URI2Param.pm in site_perl/Apache doesn't matter. Therefore, I would like to resubmit option 5: 5) Include Apache::URI2Param with the CGI::URI2Param

Re: RFC: CGI vs. Apache Namespace Question

2001-12-12 Thread darren chamberlain
Thomas Klausner [EMAIL PROTECTED] said something to this effect on 12/11/2001: I've got a small CPAN Namespace Question: Some time ago I wrote CGI::URI2param ( http://search.cpan.org/search?mode=modulequery=URI2param ). Now, thanks to an idea by darren chamberlain, I wrote a small

Re: RFC: CGI vs. Apache Namespace Question

2001-12-12 Thread James G Smith
darren chamberlain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 5) Include Apache::URI2Param with the CGI::URI2Param module that gets installed along with CGI::URI2Param if Apache.pm is installed, where Apache::URI2Param calls CGI::URI2Param::uri2param. That'd be the way I would go, although

Re: RFC: CGI vs. Apache Namespace Question

2001-12-12 Thread darren chamberlain
James G Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] said something to this effect on 12/12/2001: darren chamberlain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 5) Include Apache::URI2Param with the CGI::URI2Param module that gets installed along with CGI::URI2Param if Apache.pm is installed, where Apache::URI2Param

RFC: CGI vs. Apache Namespace Question

2001-12-11 Thread Thomas Klausner
Hi! I've got a small CPAN Namespace Question: Some time ago I wrote CGI::URI2param ( http://search.cpan.org/search?mode=modulequery=URI2param ). Now, thanks to an idea by darren chamberlain, I wrote a small PerlInitHandler that does nothing more than parse some PerlSetVars and then call