Can anyone give me recommendations on a good Mail handler that
integrates well with mod_perl?
I have a system whereby I want to give people the ability to mail the
currently viewed page to someone. Once they select a To: address, the
system will look up some data, re-construct the viewed page in
We use MIME::Lite seems to work well for us.
-Original Message-
From: Jon Robison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 8:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Sending Mail
Can anyone give me recommendations on a good Mail handler that
integrates well
Can MIME::Lite do attachments?
--Jon
Joe Breeden wrote:
We use MIME::Lite seems to work well for us.
-Original Message-
From: Jon Robison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 8:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Sending Mail
Can anyone give me
Jon Robison wrote:
Can MIME::Lite do attachments?
yes. there is an example in the cookbook that uses MIME::Lite:
http://www.modperlcookbook.org/code/ch15/Cookbook/Mail.pm
http://www.modperlcookbook.org/code/ch15/Cookbook/EmailUploads.pm
HTH
--Geoff
Jon Robison wrote:
Can MIME::Lite do attachments?
yes, it can. install it, then read
perldoc MIME::Lite
for info on how.
I'm using Mail::Sender which can send attachments. Not sure how it
compares to Mime::Lite.
-doug
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Jon Robison wrote:
Can anyone give me recommendations on a good Mail handler that
integrates well with mod_perl?
I have a system whereby I want to give people the ability
Geesh, it's nice having the books author(s) on the mailing list here!
--Jon R.
Geoffrey Young wrote:
Jon Robison wrote:
Can MIME::Lite do attachments?
yes. there is an example in the cookbook that uses MIME::Lite:
http://www.modperlcookbook.org/code/ch15/Cookbook/Mail.pm
your circumstances are.
Later,
Gunther
On Tue, 26 Oct 1999, Stas Bekman wrote:
Hello, mod_perloids.
I'm having a gutfull of trouble sending mail under mod_perl. I'm doing
it by the books, to wit, the cookbook and the bigbirdie book, under rh
linux 5.2.
the code is
warn
At 14:02 27/10/1999 -0400, Gunther Birznieks wrote:
The advantage of using sendmail is
[1] a centralised MTA config.
[2] Graceful handling of problems and requeueing of messages if the SMTP
server specified by Net::SMTP would normally be down. eg automatic
resilience based on MX record
On Wed, 27 Oct 1999, Robin Berjon wrote:
At 14:02 27/10/1999 -0400, Gunther Birznieks wrote:
The advantage of using sendmail is
[1] a centralised MTA config.
[2] Graceful handling of problems and requeueing of messages if the SMTP
server specified by Net::SMTP would normally be down. eg
Hello, mod_perloids.
I'm having a gutfull of trouble sending mail under mod_perl. I'm doing
it by the books, to wit, the cookbook and the bigbirdie book, under rh
linux 5.2.
the code is
warn ("MAIL: Opening sendmail... path is \"".$sendmailpath."\"");
Hello, mod_perloids.
I'm having a gutfull of trouble sending mail under mod_perl. I'm doing
it by the books, to wit, the cookbook and the bigbirdie book, under rh
linux 5.2.
the code is
warn ("MAIL: Opening sendmail... path is \"".$sendmailpath."\"
Dave Mee [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello, mod_perloids.
I'm having a gutfull of trouble sending mail under mod_perl. I'm doing
it by the books, to wit, the cookbook and the bigbirdie book, under rh
linux 5.2.
the code is
warn ("MAIL: Opening sendmail... path is \""
On Tue, 26 Oct 1999, Stas Bekman wrote:
[...]
Other than that, why not to use Net::SMTP, which verifies each command and
you can arrange your code to die or warn on failure to send some field,
since it talks directly to the smtp server... take a look at the simple
send_mail() implemented
14 matches
Mail list logo
