On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 12:09:54PM -0800, rolf van widenfelt wrote:
but, if someone can offer a procedure for setting up two independent
httpd+modperl+perl
environments on one machine it would be pretty interesting!
You can do that but have to give up installing _anything_ into
/usr/lib or
face it, you are trying to perform surgery on a live subject...
with all the Makefiles you'll be making, (httpd, modperl, perl...) you're bound
to slip
on one of them and install over some of your existing stuff.
i went thru a conflict like this once, and avoided it by simply getting
a second
- Original Message -
From: "rolf van widenfelt" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: "Bill Moseley" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 3:09 PM
Subject: Re: Upgrading mod_perl on production machine (again)
face it, you are trying to perform surge
This is a revisit of a question last September where I asked about
upgrading mod_perl and Perl on a busy machine.
IIRC, Greg, Stas, and Perrin offered suggestions such as installing from
RPMs or tarballs, and using symlinks. The RPM/tarball option worries me a
bit, since if I do forget a file,
Bill Moseley wrote:
This is a revisit of a question last September where I asked about
upgrading mod_perl and Perl on a busy machine.
IIRC, Greg, Stas, and Perrin offered suggestions such as installing from
RPMs or tarballs, and using symlinks. The RPM/tarball option worries me a
bit,
Not that I have an answer to this complete problem, but I have had similar
situation, so I'll also be interested in the solutions you uncover.
I've always handled the support of multiple perl versions by installing
new versions of perl using a prefix like /usr/local/perl/5.6.0, etc.,
(I also
From: Steve Reppucci [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 11:02:44 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: Upgrading mod_perl on production machine (again)
I've always handled the support of multiple perl versions by installing
new versions of perl using a prefix like /usr/local/perl/5.6.0, etc.,
(I
The RPM/tarball option worries me a
bit, since if I do forget a file, then I'll be down for a while, plus I
don't have another machine of the same type where I can create the
tarball.
There's no substitute for testing. If it's really important to have a very
short down time, you need a
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, David McCabe wrote:
From: Steve Reppucci [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've always handled the support of multiple perl versions by installing
new versions of perl using a prefix like /usr/local/perl/5.6.0, etc.,
(I also place CPAN's build directory under that tree.)
That
