On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Peter Bi wrote:
Problem in authentication: if mod_perl returns cached header and the
document is proxy cached in the plain Apache, the backend authentication
handler (in the mod_perl server) will not be able to protect it.
If you use HTTP Basic authentication then
PB == Peter Bi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
PB The linked page is great, especially the first picture.
PB Problem in authentication: if mod_perl returns cached header and the
PB document is proxy cached in the plain Apache, the backend authentication
PB handler (in the mod_perl server) will not
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Peter Bi wrote:
The linked page is great, especially the first picture.
Problem in authentication: if mod_perl returns cached header and
the document is proxy cached in the plain Apache, the backend
authentication handler (in the mod_perl server) will not be able
to
On Thu, 12 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Josh,
How about the dual setup, a plain Apache + a mod_perl
Apache, which some mod_perl sites are based on?
You don't do that for raw performance as measured in a typical
simple benchmark environment. The dual setup is used to not
needlessly
Message -
From: Ask Bjoern Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Josh Chamas [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 3:36 AM
Subject: Re: performance regarding mod_perl vs mod_c with embedded perl
You don't do that for raw performance as measured
Pierre Laplante wrote:
I do not use mod_perl with CGI emulation.
Actually PerlSetupEnv is on by default. Put PerlSetupEnv Off in your
httpd.conf.
Here is my mod_perl code:
You are not running the same Perl code in both situations. Under
mod_perl, you are using Apache::File and various
Hi Josh,
How about the dual setup, a plain Apache + a mod_perl
Apache, which some mod_perl sites are based on? Another
interesting candidate is fastCGI.
Peter
We get very similar numbers in our benchmarking. Please see
the benchmarks I have published on this at:
Pierre Laplante wrote:
If I compiled a c module that embed a perl interpreter and
I benchmark this again the same module in mod_perl
I got a big difference in favor of mod_c.
It will be hard for anyone to give you a good answer unless you post the
code that you benchmarked. At a guess, I
On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Perrin Harkins wrote:
Pierre Laplante wrote:
If I compiled a c module that embed a perl interpreter and
I benchmark this again the same module in mod_perl
I got a big difference in favor of mod_c.
It will be hard for anyone to give you a good answer unless you
If I compiled a c module that embed a perl interpreter and
I benchmark this again the same module in mod_perl
I got a big difference in favor of mod_c.
For example mod_c give with ab:
Requests per second:674.76 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request: 11.86 [ms] (mean)
Time per request:
Interesting but isn't the difference within
statistical fluctuation ? :-)
Did you compare them to the pure C module (without embed
Perl)?
Peter Bi
If I compiled a c module that embed a perl interpreter and
I benchmark this again the same module in mod_perl
I got a big difference in
11 matches
Mail list logo
