William McKee wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 04:53:45PM +, Joe Orton wrote:
Check for the result of the:
"checking if O_NONBLOCK setting is inherited from listening sockets"
test when you run the configure script.
I wasn't sure if you were referring to the mod_perl or Apache configure
script.
William McKee wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 07:14:24PM -0500, Stas Bekman wrote:
Yes, it is (though keep in mind that this is a virtual server running as
a jailed process, not a separate machine).
That could be the reason.
But if I open a lynx session and surf over to localhost, my server comes
u
Boysenberry Payne wrote:
I'm using mod_perl with Apache::Register in the httpd.conf file.
The only way I can get output to my web browser is by using
my $r = Apache->request;
$r->print( "Output" );
This is regardless of the Content Type declaration.
If I try printing using a standard print command
> -Original Message-
> From: Perrin Harkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 3:13 PM
> To: Barksdale, Ray
> Cc: mod_perl
> Subject: Re: sharing big global hash and objects
>
>
> Does that work? It looks really strange to me, and may be doing some
> copyi
On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 13:56 -0600, Barksdale, Ray wrote:
> The module containing $hash is loaded in startup.pl at boot.
> I then have a package that creates an object based on a slice of the hash:
>
> package FooBar;
>
> use Config qw($hash);
>
> sub new {
> my ($class, $table, $field) = @
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 04:53:45PM +, Joe Orton wrote:
> Check for the result of the:
>
> "checking if O_NONBLOCK setting is inherited from listening sockets"
>
> test when you run the configure script.
I wasn't sure if you were referring to the mod_perl or Apache configure
script. When I ra
I have a large structure loaded from a db table that contains parameter
values.
The structure looks something like following (please excuse formatting, MS
lookOut)
my $hash = {
table1 => {
field1 => {
param1 => val,
param2 =>
I'm using mod_perl with Apache::Register in the httpd.conf file.
The only way I can get output to my web browser is by using
my $r = Apache->request;
$r->print( "Output" );
This is regardless of the Content Type declaration.
If I try printing using a standard print command I get nothing.
I've been
I'm using mod_perl with Apache::Register in the httpd.conf file.
The only way I can get output to my web browser is by using
my $r = Apache->request;
$r->print( "Output" );
This is regardless of the Content Type declaration.
If I try printing using a standard print command I get nothing.
I've been
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 09:18:31AM -0500, William McKee wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 10:39:46AM +, Joe Orton wrote:
> > That was all the non-blocking-vs-blocking stuff. First I'd ask whether
> > or not this fails in a non-chroot environment. A chroot will screw up
> > all kinds of stuff (
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 10:40:52PM -0500, Stas Bekman wrote:
> I wonder if it'd be a good idea to make CGI.pm libapreq aware. Most people
> use CGI.pm since it parses input and generates the output, so empowering
> CGI.pm with libapreq speed would be really cool.
Actually, I thought[1] the goal
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 10:52:06PM -0500, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Thanks, William. I've committed an extended version of your patch but at
> the beginning of that section. Please let me know if it needs more work.
Looks good. That explains it the way I now understand it to work.
> I believe the er
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 10:39:46AM +, Joe Orton wrote:
> That was all the non-blocking-vs-blocking stuff. First I'd ask whether
> or not this fails in a non-chroot environment. A chroot will screw up
> all kinds of stuff (e.g. the resolver libraries) unless you set it up
> properly.
Any poin
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 07:12:11PM -0500, Stas Bekman wrote:
> please look at your original report, William, it was failing the same 2
> sub-tests.
That's weird because it's only failing one if I run it by itself. This
obviously wasn't the case earlier when I reported the error. At any
rate, this
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 07:14:24PM -0500, Stas Bekman wrote:
> >Yes, it is (though keep in mind that this is a virtual server running as
> >a jailed process, not a separate machine).
>
> That could be the reason.
But if I open a lynx session and surf over to localhost, my server comes
up fine.
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 07:12:11PM -0500, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Joe, do you have an idea why this doesn't work on FreeBSD 5.3 (in jail
> environment). I remember last time you've fixed something about some BSD
> flavor in APR socket lib. Thanks.
That was all the non-blocking-vs-blocking stuff. F
16 matches
Mail list logo
