Re: Apache2::SizeLimit & Linux::Smaps on x86_64

2007-10-05 Thread Max Kanat-Alexander
On Sat, 6 Oct 2007 00:39:42 -0400 "Perrin Harkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If top can't figure out how much memory a process is using, I don't > see how SizeLimit is going to. Is it possible they really are using > that much, but a lot of it is shared via copy-on-write? Yes, they rea

Re: Apache2::SizeLimit & Linux::Smaps on x86_64

2007-10-05 Thread Perrin Harkins
On 10/5/07, Max Kanat-Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have an x86_64 machine running RHEL5 but with the mod_perl > 2.0.3 from Fedora 7. > > Without Linux::Smaps installed, Apache2::SizeLimit thinks my > processes are taking up 300MB and terminates them after every hit. > ("

Apache2::SizeLimit & Linux::Smaps on x86_64

2007-10-05 Thread Max Kanat-Alexander
I have an x86_64 machine running RHEL5 but with the mod_perl 2.0.3 from Fedora 7. Without Linux::Smaps installed, Apache2::SizeLimit thinks my processes are taking up 300MB and terminates them after every hit. ("top" thinks so too, but "free -m" quickly proves that's untrue.)

Re: monitoring server and which ports they are connected to.

2007-10-05 Thread Stephane Chazelas
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 03:25:52PM -0600, Tyler Bird wrote: [...] > Hey this worked great for seeing servers connected to port 80, but it > didn't show any servers bound and listening to port 443. Sounds like a problem in your /etc/services file. > On my system I even did a telnet 192.168.0.252

Re: monitoring server and which ports they are connected to.

2007-10-05 Thread Tyler Bird
Stephane Chazelas wrote: On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 01:01:52PM -0700, Manoj Bist wrote: Try 'sudo lsof -i:443'. [...] See also: ss -a 'src :https' (ss is part of iproute, the new suite of ip managment tools for Linux). Cheers, Stephane Hey this worked great for seeing servers conne

Re: Best version of Apache for Win32 deployment

2007-10-05 Thread Randy Kobes
On Fri, 5 Oct 2007, Octavian Rasnita wrote: Hi, I've tried installing ActivePerl 5.8.8 built 820 and with mod_perl 2.03 and Apache 2.2.4 the web server can start and works fine. Could Active Perl 5.8.8 build 822 have a problem? Are the same versions of all modules being used with both Acti

Re: Best version of Apache for Win32 deployment

2007-10-05 Thread Octavian Rasnita
Hi, I've tried installing ActivePerl 5.8.8 built 820 and with mod_perl 2.03 and Apache 2.2.4 the web server can start and works fine. Could Active Perl 5.8.8 build 822 have a problem? Octavian - Original Message - From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Octavian Rasni

Re: mod_rewrite is working strangely while using mod_perl

2007-10-05 Thread Geoffrey Young
Marco Bretschneider wrote: > Hi, > > I reported a bug that seems to be related to mod_rewrite of apache. > It turns out, that the problem only occurs while using mod_perl. > Note, that everything else is working fine with mod_perl. Anyway I'm > not quite sure where this bug belongs to (mod_perl

[1]mod_perl fail to handle scripts

2007-10-05 Thread Vitaly V. Ch
after installing mod_perl-2.0.3 and configuring according to http://search.cpan.org/~mschout/Apache-AuthCookie-3.10/lib/Apache2/AuthCookie.pm I detect then perl-script respond itself in plain-text instead of running. Logs do not consist any error I'm confused. Resulting apache configs at links:

Proba

2007-10-05 Thread Vitaly V. Ch
proba

Fw: Best version of Apache for Win32 deployment

2007-10-05 Thread Octavian Rasnita
Hi, Here is a message from somebody that monitors the mod_perl mailing list but cannot send messages to it. Can anyone comment? Thank you. Octavian, I solved it by going back to Activestate 820. I also found that the problem is not on Vista. Both Apache 2.22 and 2.24 have the problem. It ca

mod_rewrite is working strangely while using mod_perl

2007-10-05 Thread Marco Bretschneider
Hi, I reported a bug that seems to be related to mod_rewrite of apache. It turns out, that the problem only occurs while using mod_perl. Note, that everything else is working fine with mod_perl. Anyway I'm not quite sure where this bug belongs to (mod_perl or mod_rewrite). I was asked to report