We have another project to get start with, some linux hosts to server
file downloading requests.
Apache is just used to server static large files, without any external
modules, except the modperl handler for access control, like ip and
processes limit.
We have run mp1 in large application, and run
Michael Rendell wrote:
> Subject: [mp1] PerlFreshRestart, perl_reload_inc, segmentation fault (patch)
>
> When using mod_perl-1.30 (with perl 5.8.5, apache 1.3.37)
> with "PerlFreshRestart On" (yes, dangerous), httpd gets a segmentation
> fault.
Yup, verified this one.
> Using valgrind, discove
Woff3 wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I had Apache 2.0 and mod_perl.
You possibly meant Apache 1.3.xx and mod_perl-1.xx ?
> Now I upgraded to Apache 2.2.6 and mod_perl2.
>
> I have html-pages where I use mason code.
>
> [code]
> $r->header_out("Refresh" => "5; url=$url");
> This code worked fine in my previo
So, we're using Flex now for a couple neat tools that started as an (real
simple) experiment with some feeds we produce. I'm sure a lot of other
front end developers are too and just don't realize that they are connecting
to modperl backends. Subtle details aside, Flex is cool at this point for
li
I use Aptana (www.aptana.com) for web development (JS/CSS/HTML).
Firebug is good for debugging DOM issues on Firefox but unfortunately
doesn't do you much good on IE. The cross-browser stuff you just do.
d
Perrin Harkins wrote:
On Dec 2, 2007 6:10 PM, David Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Dec 2, 2007 6:10 PM, David Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> AJAX is anything but time-consuming once you get the hang of it. I much
> prefer it to traditional server-side dynamic page construction, which
> really is time-consuming.
My experience has been that even the best JavaScript tools (
AJAX is anything but time-consuming once you get the hang of it. I much
prefer it to traditional server-side dynamic page construction, which
really is time-consuming.
If you haven't seen ExtJS yet, you're missing something:
http://www.extjs.com.
d
Perrin Harkins wrote:
On Dec 1, 2007 3:
On Dec 1, 2007 3:22 PM, Will Fould <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Have you thought about it too?
Yes. It sounds possibly quicker than AJAX, which is pretty
time-consuming to develop for anything non-trivial. (Google makes it
look easy, but they probably spent millions debugging those maps on
multi
>On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 12:22:57PM -0800, Will Fould wrote:
>>
>> ... page on the flex.org website ...
>>
On Dec 1, 2007 4:33 PM, Joel Bernstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 12:22:57PM -0800, Will Fould wrote:
> > Is anyone on this list using (or considering using) a mo
