Hi,
One of the first things I would look is their job postings...if they are
switching, that would be one sign. Indeed, I saw a few software
development jobs on amazon asking for Java and C/C++ experience. Only
found one asking for any two of Java, C/C++, and Perl. Of course, this
is just
On 23 Feb 2008, at 07:25, Jie Gao wrote:
Choosing java for better performance would certainly be a joke.
Java isn't slow you know :)
Memory usage, well, that depends. But it's not slow.
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
I think what Jie meant was "choosing java *just* for performance would
certainly be a joke"
On 2/23/08, Andy Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 23 Feb 2008, at 07:25, Jie Gao wrote:
> > Choosing java for better performance would certainly be a joke.
>
>
> Java isn't slow you know :)
>
> Mem
On 23 Feb 2008, at 11:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think what Jie meant was "choosing java *just* for performance would
certainly be a joke"
Ah. Sorry.
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
I've heard from a few reputable sources that Amazon is looking to drop
mod_perl, and push into another technology ( which I've also head is
likely to be Java ).
I always thought amazon was a good argument for perl but not mod_perl -
last time I looked they were using
hi,
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, Michael Lackhoff wrote:
In a recent issue of the German iX magazine there was a report about a
similar migration (www.mobile.de I think).
I would like to comment on that article. I think it is very important to
read this article less as a "Everyone should migrate to J
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 06:25:42PM +1100, Jie Gao wrote:
>
> Choosing java for better performance would certainly be a joke. If a
> java solution fails, it would be an industry-standard failure, backside
> covered. :-)
>
Just a variation on the old, "Nobody ever got fired for choosing IBM."
Rega
modperl is fast, but it consumes too much memory.
so we choose fastcgi written by C++.
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 10:49 PM, Roberto C. Sánchez
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 06:25:42PM +1100, Jie Gao wrote:
> >
> > Choosing java for better performance would certainly be a joke
offtopic:
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, J. Peng wrote:
modperl is fast, but it consumes too much memory.
so we choose fastcgi written by C++.
actually it consumes less memory than FastCGI if you do it right. If you
load as many modules and data structures as you can at startup time,
Apache will share
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 8:59 PM, Jonathan Vanasco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've heard from a few reputable sources that Amazon is looking to
> drop mod_perl, and push into another technology ( which I've also
> head is likely to be Java ).
Amazon uses Mason with FastCGI. They have never used
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 10:08 AM, Tina Müller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, J. Peng wrote:
>
> > modperl is fast, but it consumes too much memory.
> > so we choose fastcgi written by C++.
>
> actually it consumes less memory than FastCGI if you do it right. If you
> load as many
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 11:08 PM, Tina Müller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> offtopic:
>
>
> On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, J. Peng wrote:
>
> > modperl is fast, but it consumes too much memory.
> > so we choose fastcgi written by C++.
>
> actually it consumes less memory than FastCGI if you do it right. I
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, J. Peng wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, J. Peng wrote:
>
> > modperl is fast, but it consumes too much memory.
> > so we choose fastcgi written by C++.
>
> actually it consumes less memory than FastCGI if you do it right. If you
> load as many modules and data structures
J. Peng wrote:
Apache with prefork mode can share the memory? Sorry I didn't know it.
Sharing memory between multi-processes need extra programming, I don't
know apache has done it already.
Both prefork and worker models share memory. fork() takes all of your
pages and marks them "copy on wri
14 matches
Mail list logo
