Hi John,
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 10:17 -0500, John Deighan wrote:
> However, we're also not sure if either of these are needed to escape the
> 2 GB memory limitation. E.g., can 64 bit Perl be used with a 32 bit
> Apache and/or mod_perl?
You should use the same architecture for Perl and Apache.
> A
Hi
Am 27.01.2011 um 12:57 schrieb Michiel Beijen :
> Hi John,
>
> On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 10:17 -0500, John Deighan wrote:
>> However, we're also not sure if either of these are needed to escape the
>> 2 GB memory limitation. E.g., can 64 bit Perl be used with a 32 bit
>> Apache and/or mod_perl?
I'd forgotten about Strawberry Perl (came across it about a year ago, but never got around to trying
it). One question, though: I'm thinking there's not much point to using a 64-bit version of mod_perl
unless I'm using it with a 64-bit version of Apache. Where can I get a 64-bit version of Apache
Hi.
I have a problem installing mod_perl. Some tests fail.
Configuration:
- mod_perl 2.0.4
- Linux version 2.6.26-1-amd64 (Debian 2.6.26-13lenny2)
- Apache/2.2.9 (Debian)
Failing tests:
t/modperl/pnotes2...NOK 1/12# Failed test 1 in
t/modperl/pnotes2.t at line 25
t/modper
Hello,
I am writing a perl authentication module for Apache2 that must inspect some
request parameters before authorizing the requestor and forwarding the request
to a tomcat server via mod_jk.
With the GET request method this is easy, I can inspect the parameters using
$r->args and forward th
Use apreq.
>
>From: James B. Muir
>To: "modperl@perl.apache.org"
>Sent: Thu, January 27, 2011 11:08:24 AM
>Subject: POST method and PerlAuthenHandler
>
>
>Hello,
>
>I am writing a perl authentication module for Apache2 that must inspect some
>request parameters before authorizing the reque
Can you try the unofficial release candidate here?
http://people.apache.org/~phred/mod_perl-2.0.5-rc1.tar.gz
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 6:39 AM, Alexander Aparzev
wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I have a problem installing mod_perl. Some tests fail.
>
> Configuration:
>
> - mod_perl 2.0.4
> - Linux version 2.6.26
On 27.01.2011 18:08, Fred Moyer wrote:
Can you try the unofficial release candidate here?
http://people.apache.org/~phred/mod_perl-2.0.5-rc1.tar.gz
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 6:39 AM, Alexander Aparzev
wrote:
Hi.
I have a problem installing mod_perl. Some tests fail.
Thank you for the hint,
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Alexander Aparzev
wrote:
> On 27.01.2011 18:08, Fred Moyer wrote:
>>> I have a problem installing mod_perl. Some tests fail.
>
> Thank you for the hint, Fred. Gave it a try. Regrettably, the same result.
> There is nothing unusual in t/logs/error_log either.
Can
OP, see
https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/websites/cms/webgui/lib/ASF/CMS/Cookie.pm
for typical APR::Request::Cookie usage with FreezeThaw as serializer. Unless
you
want to use arrays this is one of the ways to deal with hashrefs as cookie
values.
In your calling code you'd do something like
On 27.01.2011 20:19, Fred Moyer wrote:
Can you run the failing tests with verbose mode and post the results here?
./t/TEST -verbose t/modperl/pnotes2.t
Sure. Did it:
[warning] setting ulimit to allow core files
ulimit -c unlimited; /usr/bin/perl
/home/justme/sources/mod_perl-2.0.5-rc1/t/TE
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Alexander Aparzev
wrote:
> On 27.01.2011 20:19, Fred Moyer wrote:
>>
>> Can you run the failing tests with verbose mode and post the results here?
>>
>> ./t/TEST -verbose t/modperl/pnotes2.t
>
> Sure. Did it:
>
> [warning] setting ulimit to allow core files
> uli
Hi John,
On Thu, January 27, 2011 15:10, John Deighan wrote:
> One question, though: I'm thinking there's not much point to using a
> 64-bit version of mod_perl
> unless I'm using it with a 64-bit version of Apache. Where can I get a
> 64-bit version of Apache that
> will with with the mod_perl be
On 27.01.2011 20:55, Fred Moyer wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Alexander Aparzev
wrote:
On 27.01.2011 20:19, Fred Moyer wrote:
Can you run the failing tests with verbose mode and post the results here?
./t/TEST -verbose t/modperl/pnotes2.t
Sure. Did it:
[warning] setting ulim
Hi, I am trying to build libapreq2 so that I may use it with Apache2 and
mod_perl. I'm on a Solaris 10 system. The version of Apache I am using is old:
./bin/apachectl -v
Server version: Apache/2.0.59
Server built: Aug 22 2006 11:38:34
I receive the following surprising errors during the build
My guess is that your 64 bit setup with ithreads is causing this
error. Does anyone else here have 64 bit they can test with an
ithreads enabled perl?
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Alexander Aparzev
wrote:
> On 27.01.2011 20:55, Fred Moyer wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Alexa
In message <527c4914f1b2ea47b38422de0fa05a65064b1ba...@dh201.dhmcmaster.dh.hitc
hcock.org>, "James B. Muir" writes:
>Hi, I am trying to build libapreq2 so that I may use it with Apache2 and mo=
>d_perl. I'm on a Solaris 10 system. The version of Apache I am using is old=
>:
>
>./bin/apachectl -v
>S
On 26 Jan 2011, at 15:17, John Deighan wrote:
> What we would like is to run this application in a 64 bit environment, thus
> allowing us to use more than the 2 GB memory that the Apache process ('httpd')
> is limited to (the "Out of memory" errors always occur as the memory usage
> of the httpd
On 01/27/2011 07:05 PM, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
Can I just say: WTF? 2G in an Apache? Surely there's a better way of
architecting
this?
One thing to remember is that he's running Windows which doesn't have
Copy-On-Write memory, so depending on what he's doing it might not take
up as much mem
Michael Peters schrieb am 27.01.2011 um 19:14 (-0500):
> But, even after all that I have applications where we consistently
> run 3-4G just for mod_perl/Apache.
But surely not in one process as the OP said he'd like to do?
--
Michael Ludwig
On 01/27/2011 07:41 PM, Michael Ludwig wrote:
Michael Peters schrieb am 27.01.2011 um 19:14 (-0500):
But, even after all that I have applications where we consistently
run 3-4G just for mod_perl/Apache.
But surely not in one process as the OP said he'd like to do?
No you're right, but I'm g
On 1/27/2011 7:16 PM, Michael Peters wrote:
> On 01/27/2011 07:41 PM, Michael Ludwig wrote:
>> Michael Peters schrieb am 27.01.2011 um 19:14 (-0500):
>>
>>> But, even after all that I have applications where we consistently
>>> run 3-4G just for mod_perl/Apache.
>>
>> But surely not in one process
22 matches
Mail list logo
