On 7/4/11 11:26 PM, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
I'm not happy, hence the complaining about the AMI from 2009. But I'm glad you
changed the subject from your first one, which is that I should build my own
stack.
So basically you are saying (and only you, not a community voice) that in order
to
On 5 Jul 2011, at 08:53, Tosh Cooey wrote:
> On 7/4/11 11:26 PM, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I'm not happy, hence the complaining about the AMI from 2009. But I'm glad
>>> you changed the subject from your first one, which is that I should build
>>> my own stack.
>>>
>>> So basically
Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
On 5 Jul 2011, at 08:53, Tosh Cooey wrote:
On 7/4/11 11:26 PM, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
I'm not happy, hence the complaining about the AMI from 2009. But I'm glad you
changed the subject from your first one, which is that I should build my own
stack.
So basically you a
On 5 Jul 2011, at 10:53, André Warnier wrote:
> Personally, I must say that statements like "I just spent six months helping
> a company do exactly[0] this" make me dream. I must be in the wrong
> triangle...
>
It was an interesting dynamic. Ownership of the Apache stack moved to the
develo
The point was, and is, that it's unfortunate that mod_perl developers
need to:
1) Build and optimize Apache.
2) Build and optimize MySql.
3) Build and optimize Perl+mod_perl.
4) Build and optimize a Linux server environment.
or
5) Have enough money to pay for all of the above.
Those are all roa
Le lundi 04 juillet 2011 à 23:00 +0200, Tosh Cooey a écrit :
> On 7/4/11 12:33 PM, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
> >> Is there a reason for the lack of plug'n'play mod_perl LAMP cloud service
> >> providers? Or are there a ton that I just don't know about?
> >>
> >
> > Because you really should build y
