Re: [MP2] 1.999024 fails on OS X

2005-05-15 Thread Christian Hansen
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote: After a long promised investigation session, I believe I have pinned it down. It seems to have been introduced by change r160562 when the anon_cnt initialization code was moved around as a result. Didn't have enough time tonight to dig down as to _why_ this is breaking t

Re: [PMX:####] Re: [MP2] 1.999024 fails on OS X

2005-05-14 Thread Christian Hansen
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote: Just rebuilt myself a fresh blead-perl, fresh httpd-2.0-svn and mod_perl-2.0-svn. All tests passed! My hunch is that's it's something about Apple's Perl, and I'll investigate more later on. For now, I guess the best advice is to try with a self-built Perl and see if that

Re: [MP2] 1.999024 fails on OS X

2005-05-14 Thread Christian Hansen
Stas Bekman wrote: Christian, any difference if you test with perl w/o ithreads? Yes, perl 5.8.6 compiled without ithreads works. perl 5.8.5 and 5.8.6 with ithreads fails. Regards Christian Hansen

Re: [MP2] 1.999024 fails on OS X

2005-05-13 Thread Christian Hansen
Stas Bekman wrote: Christian Hansen wrote: I'm using trunk, revision: 169956. With 1.999.21 all tests passes, so guess something changed in the namespace change. With the same perl and apache versions/configuration? Yes exactly the same, i did a retest before submitting this report. Chri

[MP2] 1.999024 fails on OS X

2005-05-13 Thread Christian Hansen
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.mod-perl/18408 I'm using trunk, revision: 169956. With 1.999.21 all tests passes, so guess something changed in the namespace change. Please let me know if I can be at further assistance. Regards Christian Hansen 1. Problem Description: 2. Used Components

Re: Logging user's movements

2005-02-04 Thread Christian Hansen
c2616/rfc2616-sec13.html#sec13 RFC2616 10.3.8 307 Temporary Redirect http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html#sec10.3.8 -- Regards Christian Hansen