-8<-- Start Bug Report 8<--
1. Problem Description:
I'm also suffering from the common
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lapr-0
problem. Copying /usr/local/apache2/lib/libapr-0.a to /usr/lib
make the link problem go away but I still see many
"undefine
Yesterday I submitted a bug report titled
"The "cannot find -lapr-0" and ""undefined symbol:
apr_bucket_setaside_notimpl" problems again" and
you said
Jon, please try the current cvs:
http://perl.apache.org/download/source.html#Development_mod_perl_2_0_Source_Distribution
I just did. The linking
ainst
mod_perl2, I decided to forget about this for
now and use mod_perl1 which builds and runs just
fine on these platforms.
Cordially,
Jon Forrest
Computer Resources Manager
Civil and Environmental Engineering Dept.
205 Davis Hall
Univ. of Calif., Berkeley
Berkeley, CA 94720-1710
510-642-0904
[
ampus who are happily using mod_perl2/apache2 with Request
Tracker, although on FreeBsd.
Cordially,
Jon Forrest
Computer Resources Manager
Civil and Environmental Engineering Dept.
205 Davis Hall
Univ. of Calif., Berkeley
Berkeley, CA 94720-1710
510-642-0904
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Report problems: http
from the kit.
2) In the past, when I've run this step, I saw
that both the DSO and the static versions of
mod_perl will be made, as the documentation
states. This time I only see that the DSO
version is being made.
I hope these comments are useful.
Jon Forrest
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] modperl-2.0]#
Stas Bekman wrote:
Jon Forrest wrote:
Stan suggested that I try the CVS version, which I did.
I reported that its make procedure has a problem finding
httpd.
Sorry for calling you Stan, Stas.
Did you try building the DSO version? Did it work for you?
It builds but make test fails for the reason I
(I'm not sure if I should continue posting these reports
to the list. Please let me know if I should send them to just
you.)
Stas Bekman wrote:
Oh, sorry, for some reason I thought you were talking about the static
build. Could you please post the output of:
t/TEST -conf -trace=debug
I downloaded
