On Mon, 2005-02-07 at 21:37 -0500, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Nicholas Studt wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-02-07 at 19:50 -0500, Stas Bekman wrote:
> >
> >>Nicholas Studt wrote:
> >>
> >>>I'm planning on submitting the following talk proposal for a 45 minu
On Mon, 2005-02-07 at 19:50 -0500, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Nicholas Studt wrote:
> > I'm planning on submitting the following talk proposal for a 45 minute
> > presentation session:
> >
> > Inherited method handlers for mod_perl
> [...]
> > The only uncer
only uncertainty I have right now is on on the last section of the
talk. I don't know of any project currently using this method, though I
have not looked too far. If you know of a project that does use an
approach please let me know.
--
Nicholas Studt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ogether and submit
the proposal or is it too far outside of the theme this year?
--
Nicholas Studt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
/location/nested/function shows up as /nested/function rather
than /function as I would expect.
Is this a bug or am I misinterpreting what path_info should report?
--
Nicholas Studt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/ma
> Joe Schaefer wrote on 29 Jun 2004 15:00:54 -0400
>
> Nicholas Studt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> > When I read this value from a POST or a GET everything works
> > happily. When I try to add something to the table the add happens
> > witho
something in how APR::Table works or is there a better
construct I should be using?
--
nicholas studt - 29 June 2004
--
Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html
List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html
Last
I thought it should produce:
First
Last
When I add an $r->rflush immediately before the sendfile the behavior is
as I expect, but should the rflush be required?
I am running perl 5.8.3, httpd 2.0.49 and have seen this behavior in
1.99_12 and 1.99_14.
--
