Hey folks,
I'm having a bit of a struggle with Apache::Test on a Mandriva Linux
10.1 server. I'm using A::T v1.26 with Apache2.0.50 + mod_perl2.0.1. For
some reason, the configuration process is not finding the global config
file which causes my tests which are working under a Debian workstation
t
\William McKee wrote:
I've looked through the Apache::TestConfig.pm file to try to find where
the problem may be but cannot figure out where that module obtains the
configuration file or how to dump out the configuration file it is
automatically finding.
~/.apache-test/TestConfigData.pm, then @I
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 04:04:13PM -0400, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> >I've looked through the Apache::TestConfig.pm file to try to find where
> >the problem may be but cannot figure out where that module obtains the
> >configuration file or how to dump out the configuration file it is
> >automatic
I was able to get a trace from a failing case after using './Build &&
t/TEST'. Calling just 't/TEST' finds the config file correctly. So it
appears that calling ./Build is where the trouble occurs for me (though
I've never seen this behavior before). From the trace below, you can see
that A::T thin
William McKee wrote:
I was able to get a trace from a failing case after using './Build &&
t/TEST'. Calling just 't/TEST' finds the config file correctly. So it
appears that calling ./Build is where the trouble occurs for me (though
I've never seen this behavior before). From the trace below, you
William McKee wrote:
I was able to get a trace from a failing case after using './Build &&
t/TEST'. Calling just 't/TEST' finds the config file correctly. So it
appears that calling ./Build is where the trouble occurs for me (though
I've never seen this behavior before). From the trace below, you
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 06:59:56PM -0400, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> To answer your original quesiton,
> you want:
> in A-T source,
Thanks for the reference. Some further investigating showed that calling
t/TEST -clean is when I lose the -httpd_config setting which explains
why `./Build test` is
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 06:56:57PM -0400, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> >From the trace below, you can see that A::T thinks the config file is
> >'/usr/conf/httpd2.conf':
> > [ debug] isolated httpd_defines HTTPD_ROOT = /etc/httpd/2.0
> > [ debug] isolated httpd_defines SERVER_CONFIG_FILE = con
> I want it to find /etc/httpd/2.0/conf/httpd2.conf but it is finding:
>
> [ debug] isolated httpd_defines HTTPD_ROOT = /etc/httpd/2.0
> [ debug] isolated httpd_defines SERVER_CONFIG_FILE = conf/httpd2.conf
> [ debug] inheriting config file: /usr/conf/httpd2.conf
>
> I'd love to figure out wh
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 11:54:57AM -0400, Geoffrey Young wrote:
> $self->{httpd_basedir}, which looks to be calculated based on the location
> of the httpd binary. but it looks like it ought to be using HTTPD_ROOT
> instead. at least if it's defined.
>
> try this (completely untested)
Perfect!
William McKee wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 11:54:57AM -0400, Geoffrey Young wrote:
>
>>$self->{httpd_basedir}, which looks to be calculated based on the location
>>of the httpd binary. but it looks like it ought to be using HTTPD_ROOT
>>instead. at least if it's defined.
>>
>>try this (com
William McKee wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 11:54:57AM -0400, Geoffrey Young wrote:
>
>>$self->{httpd_basedir}, which looks to be calculated based on the location
>>of the httpd binary. but it looks like it ought to be using HTTPD_ROOT
>>instead. at least if it's defined.
>>
>>try this (com
> I've been thinking a bit about this and I think the attached is a better
> patch.
ugh, wrong patch. sorry
--Geoff
Index: lib/Apache/TestConfigParse.pm
===
--- lib/Apache/TestConfigParse.pm (revision 267203)
+++ lib/Apache/TestCon
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 06:19:10PM -0400, Geoffrey Young wrote:
> if you can do me the favor of trying a few different configuration scenarios
> (including 1.3, non-apxs, /usr/local/apache, etc) and making sure nothing
> breaks, that would be great. the box where my matrix used to live had a
> har
> I removed your original patch and added this one then tested it under
> the two systems above. Looks good.
committed.
--Geoff
15 matches
Mail list logo