Re: Capturing Apache response

2009-02-13 Thread Mark Hedges
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009, Solutio at Gmail wrote: First of all, I thank you both for your expert opinion on the topic. I have never had to fiddle with this sort of Apache customization, so I'm learning in the process... As for the way to communicate the file name to the filter, sure, we would

Re: Capturing Apache response

2009-02-13 Thread Solutio at Gmail
. -- From: Mark Hedges hed...@scriptdolphin.org Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 12:07 PM To: Solutio at Gmail solu...@gmail.com Cc: André Warnier a...@ice-sa.com; modperl@perl.apache.org Subject: Re: Capturing Apache response On Tue, 10 Feb 2009, Solutio at Gmail wrote

Re: Capturing Apache response

2009-02-13 Thread Mark Hedges
. -- From: Mark Hedges hed...@scriptdolphin.org Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 12:07 PM To: Solutio at Gmail solu...@gmail.com Cc: André Warnier a...@ice-sa.com; modperl@perl.apache.org Subject: Re: Capturing Apache response On Tue, 10 Feb 2009, Solutio at Gmail wrote: First of all

Re: Capturing Apache response

2009-02-13 Thread Solutio at Gmail
. -- From: Mark Hedges hed...@scriptdolphin.org Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 12:07 PM To: Solutio at Gmail solu...@gmail.com Cc: André Warnier a...@ice-sa.com; modperl@perl.apache.org Subject: Re: Capturing Apache response On Tue, 10 Feb 2009, Solutio at Gmail wrote: First

Re: Capturing Apache response

2009-02-10 Thread Mark Hedges
Solutio at Gmail wrote: Thanks, your version works like a charm...but doesn't quite meets our needs. I apologize for being too vague regarding passing parameters on to the filter. Basically, we would like to somehow link the location and name of the response dump with the request data, like

Re: Capturing Apache response

2009-02-10 Thread André Warnier
Mark Hedges wrote: [...] Then the connection output filter can read it from there. Remove connection and I agree, that's much cleaner than putting it in a header. A similar post-request PerlCleanupHandler or PerlLogHandler could save any info needed after the request was processed. But

Re: Capturing Apache response

2009-02-10 Thread Solutio at Gmail
a...@ice-sa.com Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 4:04 PM To: modperl@perl.apache.org Subject: Re: Capturing Apache response Mark Hedges wrote: [...] Then the connection output filter can read it from there. Remove connection and I agree, that's much cleaner than putting it in a header

Re: Capturing Apache response

2009-02-09 Thread Mark Hedges
On Sun, 8 Feb 2009, Solutio at Gmail wrote: I wonder if there is a workaround for this without adding a connection filter? Try using something like the all-in-one FilterSnoop handler on the same page at http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/user/handlers/filters.html#All_in_One_Filter - I had good

Re: Capturing Apache response

2009-02-09 Thread Alexander Saip
Subject: Re: Capturing Apache response Hi. Sorry to top-post, but I think in this case it will be clearer. Not being the ultimate guru, but being probably the only guy available at this day and time, I'll try my hand, at the risk of getting contradicted by the real gurus later. So start

Capturing Apache response

2009-02-08 Thread Solutio at Gmail
We are trying to implement a solution that would allow us to capture Apache (v. 2.0.63) responses sent to clients, each in a separate file on the server. I added a bucket brigade based output filter that mimics an example found in