> andy law (RI) wrote:
> > Well, they don't because there is the whole issue of the
> location of
> > the libaprutil.so library which was Darryl's problem (and
> one that I
> > share too). Is that fixed as well in the next release?
> Thread link please ?
msg11128 et seq. I found it at
http:
andy law (RI) wrote:
> Well, they don't because there is the whole issue of the location of the
> libaprutil.so library which was Darryl's problem (and one that I share
> too). Is that fixed as well in the next release?
Thread link please ?
--
-
> Yes, both status. and content_length_header.t are fixed in
> SVN and will be fixed in the 2.0.3 release.
Hurrah!
>
>
> > I also understand from trawling through the mailing list
> archives - a > not entirely pain-free procedure itself -
> that the mod_perl 'grown-ups'
> > are "getting
was treated like an
insignificant thing, when for some new users it may be far from it.
Adam
-Original Message-
From: Philip M. Gollucci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 2:04 PM
To: andy law (RI)
Cc: modperl@perl.apache.org
Subject: Re: Failing tests - a plea from the
andy law (RI) wrote:
> I've just finished beating my head against the modperl tests. I
> understand that I'm not alone in having been down this route.
No sir, you are not.
Yes, both status. and content_length_header.t are fixed in SVN and will be
fixed in the 2.0.3 release.
> I also understand
I've just finished beating my head against the modperl tests. I
understand that I'm not alone in having been down this route.
I also understand from trawling through the mailing list archives - a
not entirely pain-free procedure itself - that the mod_perl 'grown-ups'
are "getting tired" of answeri
