Wait. Is this the one with the horrible bug that knackers OO?
On 25 Jul 2011, at 23:43, Christopher Stanton wrote:
> Requires: perl >= 5.8.8-32
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 8:36 AM, Christopher Stanton
wrote:
> Which benchmark module would work best with mod_perl, Perl 5.8 and Perl 5.12?
For web apps, I usually write my own test with LWP (or HTTP::Async if
you want to simulate a lot of users). To see where things are slow,
use Devel::NYTProf
Which benchmark module would work best with mod_perl, Perl 5.8 and Perl 5.12?
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 7:22 AM, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
>
> On 26 Jul 2011, at 18:58, Christopher Stanton wrote:
>
>> I will see if I can get Perl 5.12 and an associated mod_perl up and
>> running on the problem machine
On 26 Jul 2011, at 18:58, Christopher Stanton wrote:
> I will see if I can get Perl 5.12 and an associated mod_perl up and
> running on the problem machine and see if the CPU utilization goes
> down.
Is benchmarking out of the question?
I will see if I can get Perl 5.12 and an associated mod_perl up and
running on the problem machine and see if the CPU utilization goes
down.
Long long ago in a install far far away I did not run into this issue
on FC4 which has very similar packages other than apache (2.0 rather
than 2.2):
Require
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Christopher Stanton
wrote:
> I am seeing high cpu utilization under RHEL5.6 which I don't see on
> FC14. We are talking sub 10% on FC14 vs 80% on EL5. This is on
> different hardware, but not that different.
Well, you've changed hardware and lots of software versi
Before I start playing mix-and-match with kernels, I would prefer some
feedback on mod_perl and the script's code.
It doesn't sleep in the main loop, but it should block on
my @ready = $select->can_read(1);
and not block on
if ( $sock->read(my $data, POSIX::BUFSIZ*10) ){
since the socket is set w
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Christopher Stanton
wrote:
> Neither install is running within VMWare.
Might be worthwhile trying a different rate though, or going tickless.
Perl 5.8.8 isn't that much (if at all) slower than 5.12. Looks like
the FC14 kernel is tickless:
http://docs.fedoraproj
Neither install is running within VMWare.
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Fred Moyer wrote:
> This may not be related, but when I was working with Centos 5 in a
> Vmware environment, I ran into an issue of high cpu since the default
> clock rate with Linux 2.6 is 1000Hz. I changed to a 100Hz cl
This may not be related, but when I was working with Centos 5 in a
Vmware environment, I ran into an issue of high cpu since the default
clock rate with Linux 2.6 is 1000Hz. I changed to a 100Hz clock rate
and got much lower cpu usage.
I'm not sure if that is your issue, perhaps FC14 was using le
I have a MJPEG streaming system which uses mod_perl in the web
interface to supply the final stream to the client.
I am seeing high cpu utilization under RHEL5.6 which I don't see on
FC14. We are talking sub 10% on FC14 vs 80% on EL5. This is on
different hardware, but not that different. And on E
11 matches
Mail list logo
